A practical solution would be a well designed 404.
We could get pdoc to generate it with a search field, etc.
We could also try JS redirection.
Anyone wants to give it a shot?
Best,
Tobie
On Apr 6, 8:42 am, "T.J. Crowder" wrote:
> > My coworkers still find old docs (http://prototypejs.org/ap
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 11:00, Tobie Langel wrote:
>
> We could also try JS redirection.
It would partially solve the problem, but old pages would still remain in
Google index for too long a time. We should get access to the server level
and set up rewrite rules or similar.
--
You received thi
I disagree. 404'ing the old docs is not the correct action. 404 means "not
found", but the user is requesting a page that he (and you) know exists...
it's just not at that location any more. Thus, a redirect is the way to go.
I'd suggest the following
- Move the old docs somewhere they're stil
+1 for the scrolling. The navigation between documentation links has
much improved, but the navigation panel still has issues. The wheel-
scroll is painfully slow. Even clicking in the scroll bar doesn't work
as expected. When you click a position in the scroll bar, usually it
jumps to where you cl
The scroll bar is native to the browser, meaning it's the same as in a
regular window, iframe or frameset. The navigation panel should scroll with
same methods and speed as every window in your browser.
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 14:15, joe t. wrote:
> +1 for the scrolling. The navigation between d
Robert, that would be great. We unfortunately don't have this level of
access to the server.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Prototype: Core" group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-core@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group,
Urm... really? You can do 404's but not 301's?
Not saying I don't believe you, I'm just surprised that a project as mature
as prototype is hosted in an environment that doesn't support basic
.htaccess-style configuration.
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 6:12 AM, Tobie Langel wrote:
> Robert, that would
> Urm... really? You can do 404's but not 301's?
I was suggesting crating a good 404 page. Not modifying the http
response code.
> Not saying I don't believe you, I'm just surprised that a project as mature
> as prototype is hosted in an environment that doesn't support basic
> .htaccess-style
