Colin Mollenhour wrote:
> But, I don't think the overhead of a bind call and the storage of an
> object with a function for EACH event observed is justifiable, just to
> have the convenience of:
> handle.stopObserving();
> rather than:
> Event.stopObserving(handle);
Colin, your patch is superb
Along with all this Event handling discussion, I'd like to throw in my
ideas for a rewrite of Event.observe et al before I test and submit as a
patch. My proposed changes allow the traditional Event.stopObserving()
and simplify some of the current messaging ideas. Please provide feedback.
Co
