> Or said another way, I can't store "keys", "values", "map", "find", etc in a
> Hash (unless I'm missing something clever).
Yes you can... but they override the existing methods.
So for example: $H({map: 2}) works as expected except you won't be
able to use map or any method that relies on it
> Wouldn't those methods be a better fit for the Enumerables or Hash ?
Both Hash and Enumerable add numerous keys to the "set". Or said
another way, I can't store "keys", "values", "map", "find", etc in a
Hash (unless I'm missing something clever).
--~--~-~--~~~-
Hi Jeff,
Wouldn't those methods be a better fit for the Enumerables or Hash ?
Regards,
Tobie
On Jul 20, 1:04 am, Jeff Watkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've often found myself using an object literal as a Set and after
> wishing I had some real Set operators, I finally found the time to
