Hi Frederic..
On Jul 24, 9:47 am, Frederic Gaus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > may be you have a similar problem when using cumulativeOffset()..
> Yes, your right, this is my problem - not as I first thought the Z-index.
> Could you post your fixed code so that I can try it?
I thought i did th
mariux schrieb:
>
>
> On Jul 20, 7:01 pm, Frederic Gaus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
I noticed yesterday, that Z-indexes are not observed when calculating
cumulativeOffset.
>>> Maybe I'm mising something, but what does a z-index have to do with where
>>> the
>>> element is positioned
On Jul 20, 7:01 pm, Frederic Gaus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> I noticed yesterday, that Z-indexes are not observed when calculating
> >> cumulativeOffset.
>
> > Maybe I'm mising something, but what does a z-index have to do with where
> > the
> > element is positioned? It affects the depth
Michael Peters schrieb:
> Frederic Gaus wrote:
>
>> I noticed yesterday, that Z-indexes are not observed when calculating
>> cumulativeOffset.
>
> Maybe I'm mising something, but what does a z-index have to do with where the
> element is positioned? It affects the depth but not the position ri
Frederic Gaus wrote:
> I noticed yesterday, that Z-indexes are not observed when calculating
> cumulativeOffset.
Maybe I'm mising something, but what does a z-index have to do with where the
element is positioned? It affects the depth but not the position right?
--
Michael Peters
Developer
P
