[Proto-Scripty] Re: Rant - IE7 Sucks

2011-10-27 Thread Victor
I think there is some problem in your code, because code similar to your description exists e.g. in Scriptaculous: Effect.Base = Class.create({ position: null, start: function(options) { ... }, ... }); Effect.Parallel = Class.create(Effect.Base, { initialize: function(effects) {

Re: [Proto-Scripty] Re: Form.Serialize returning nada

2011-10-27 Thread Victor
Problem is somehow related to XHTML and IE9. If you occasionally serve document as xhtml+xml, document should pass validation to work in browser. I've noticed form name=... in your example, but *name* attribute is obsolete for *form* tag in XHTML1.0, or maybe you have *nbsp;* somewhere in your

[Proto-Scripty] Re: Rant - IE7 Sucks

2011-10-27 Thread T.J. Crowder
On Oct 27, 3:46 pm, Victor vkhomyac...@gmail.com wrote: I think there is some problem in your code... I suspect so as well, which is why a couple of days ago I asked him to post a self-contained example to http://jsbin.com. -- T.J. ;-) -- You received this message because you are subscribed

Re: [Proto-Scripty] Re: Form.Serialize returning nada

2011-10-27 Thread Phil Petree
obsolete attributes should be ignored. I used the form name attribute as a way of knowing which AJAX module to call on behalf of that form. That allows my dofill() to serve many forms. I've seen very few pages of any type that validates 100% and browsers accomodate this and that's one reason

Re: [Proto-Scripty] Re: Form.Serialize returning nada

2011-10-27 Thread Victor
I used the form name attribute as a way of knowing which AJAX module to call on behalf of that form. That allows my dofill() to serve many forms. This can be made via CSS classes, not name attributes. I've seen very few pages of any type that validates 100% 1-2 errors/warnings does not

[Proto-Scripty] Re: Prototype's Event system need to be fixed

2011-10-27 Thread Victor
I've seen on github that event system is reworked, but this is still work in progress. You can download bleeding-edge version and test for yourself. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Prototype script.aculo.us group. To view this discussion on the web

[Proto-Scripty] Re: An idea from jQuery which might be borrowed to Prototype

2011-10-27 Thread Victor
Jon Dow == John Doe? ;) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Prototype script.aculo.us group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/prototype-scriptaculous/-/2jp7KMInIvAJ. To post to this group, send email to