For anyone coming to this thread later, there's now a (rough) how-to
on the unofficial wiki:
http://proto-scripty.wikidot.com/prototype:how-to-load-scripts-dynamically
-- T.J. :-)
On Oct 16, 11:11 am, T.J. Crowder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey Jason,
[Call me T.J. :-)]
Caveat: I have not
http://mpdemo.no/mpi/Doc/Moduler/MediaManager/
When I close the node down. that works perfectly.
But when I try to open it - using blindUp - That doesn't work. nothing
happend in internet explorer.
(test it in any browser, then in ie)
or it is my ie 8 beta that isn't working perfectly?
Well.
Hey guys.
For Enumerable, according to API Docs I've found: If there is no
context argument, the iterator function will preserve the scope it
would have anyway.
I've came to that:
function Person(name)
{
this.name=name;
this.Check=Check;
}
function Check()
{
alert(Context is +
Hi folks,
The initial let's get something out there layout I did for the
unofficial wiki[1] has a clear distinction between Prototype and
script.aculo.us. There are separate sections for them, and each
section has its own list of Tips, How Tos, etc. In fact, I even had
us putting pages about
It's work for me on IE 7.0.5730.13, The blindDown effect is not as
fluent as with firefox but it's working
On 17 oct, 13:25, moijk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://mpdemo.no/mpi/Doc/Moduler/MediaManager/
When I close the node down. that works perfectly.
But when I try to open it - using
@T.J:
This was a time saver on the scripts I have to load on my application
as well as have learnt something new
Many thanks ;-)
Regards
Jason
On 10/17/08, T.J. Crowder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For anyone coming to this thread later, there's now a (rough) how-to
on the unofficial wiki:
On Oct 17, 7:35 am, Tomasz Kalkosiński [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hey guys.
For Enumerable, according to API Docs I've found: If there is no
context argument, the iterator function will preserve the scope it
would have anyway.
Sorry, that's just a poor wording on our side : /
By preserve
On Oct 17, 3:44 pm, kangax [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry, that's just a poor wording on our side : /
By preserve scope it would have anyway it was probably meant that a
function is not explicitly bound to any object.
The way you understood binding in this case is actually pretty
intuitive
Hey TJ,
My vote is lump it all together. Especially since scripty has its own wiki
anyways, there are going to be sections that are really not relevant for
scripty.
Anyway, I think it makes sense to keep it primarily a prototype wiki, with
general tips for other stuff and links out to the
I have searched around for some answer to this and I have a feeling I
could make it work using bind(), but I'm not sure - I'm not exactly
understanding the examples and explanations in regard to my example.
I am returning a json object from the server/ajax. I am building some
page elements
Hi,
Is this what bind() is for? Can I *bind* my json object to a function
that refers back to the original object?
FWIW, I'd say it's a clever use of bind(). The question of whether
it's what bind() is *for* is kind of moot. (I'd say, on balance, yes
it is -- bind() is for binding
It's kind of understandable why context would
behave the way scoping (or rather identifier resolution) works.
Oh, completely. It's one of the big, big adjustments people like me
have to make coming to JavaScript from C++, Java, C#, etc. All I
meant was, having made that adjustment (er,
that's great. thanks - I'm glad I was on the right track there. This seems
very useful for dealing with ajax data.
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 3:33 PM, T.J. Crowder [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Hi,
Is this what bind() is for? Can I *bind* my json object to a function
that refers back to the
Hi again,
I will just mention that if you start using logic objects and such on
the client side where the handler is a method of the logic object,
then this becomes more problematic, since you have two different
things you want to do with this: Refer to the logic instance, and
refer to the
The tutorial that I'm referencing is located here:
http://tutorial473.easycfm.com
There are many posts of this all over the internet it seems, with
slight variations, but this one makes most sense to me.
Where it's not working is where it's checking to see if the variable
has been passed to
pancakes wrote:
I have searched around for some answer to this and I have a feeling I
could make it work using bind(), but I'm not sure - I'm not exactly
understanding the examples and explanations in regard to my example.
I am returning a json object from the server/ajax. I am building
16 matches
Mail list logo
