So here's what I am trying to do.
I have a form with two select fields: issue and subissue. The
second (subissue) is hidden by default. When the user selects one of
the items in the first (issue), I want to populate the second with
only certain options.
So I have all the options in the
Hi everyone,
My question is-- quite often I do something like this:
var Photos = (function() {
var Photos = Class.create({
initialize: function() {
var photos = this;
//etc
}
return Photos;
})();
and then when I have class methods, I have redefine a
Hi,
So this solves that problem-- but global variables are evil..
BUT.. this is in the context of a closure, so I wonder if it's less
evil?
The global variable is not affected by the fact it's being created by
code in a closure, you're still (implicitly) creating a `photos`
property on the
Hi,
I think the site needs an integrated contribution system for Prototype
Extensions, better than jQuery's(http://plugins.jquery.com/).
One thing at a time. :-) And of course, there's scripteka.com.
Some want something easier than learning git,
rake, lighthouse, etc., in order to
Thanks for the reply T.J.,
When using 'this', one other problem comes up for me which I wasn't
sure how to address. I use lowpro along with prototype for it's
Event.addBehavior stuff...
So, if I do:
var Foo = (function() {
var Foo = Class.create({
initialize:
Ok, I haven't thought this out fully, but how about
Event.addBehavior({
'#foo:click': (function() {
someFunc(this)).bind(this)
}
--
Jonathan Rosenberg
Founder Executive Director, Tabby's Place
On Apr 9, 9:53 am, Jonathan Rosenberg j...@tabbysplace.org wrote:
Ok, I haven't thought this out fully, but how about
Event.addBehavior({
'#foo:click': (function() {
someFunc(this)).bind(this)
}
Right.. that
Hello,
can anyone please help me out with a Ajax Updater?!
My script:
a class=product href=site.html onclick=new
Ajax.Updater('target_div', 'site',{method: 'get'}); return
false;Link/a
This works fine but this loads the whole site.html into the div. I
need just a part from the request site. For
Hmmm ... What do you mean by access to #foo?
--
Jonathan Rosenberg
Founder Executive Director, Tabby's Place
http://www.tabbysplace.org/
-Original Message-
From: prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com
[mailto:prototype-scriptacul...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of patrick
Sent:
Hi Patrick,
I don't quite get how I would also be able to pass in the class 'this'
instance to someFunc other than having a var foo = this; at the top of
the initialize block..
Can you see a way to get around that?
Since you replied to Jonathan that you wanted access to both #foo and
the
TJ,
Thanks for the detailed response. I mostly came to terms with this
resolution but I was hoping another programmer would prove me wrong.
It seems it can be somewhat accomplished with jQuery and PHP but
jQuery and Prototype do not currently get along all that well and I'd
had to bring that
Thanks for the reply T.J.,
Hmm.. Yeah it just seems like there's no way to win in this case. On
one hand, I have to resort to redundancy of setting var blah = this;
inside my class methods-- Otherwise, in some of my more intense
methods, I have function calls inside function calls, and have to
12 matches
Mail list logo
