[Proto-Scripty] Re: Ajax.Responders

2009-08-22 Thread Vladimir Tkach
inspect your object :) request[i].inspect() convert obj to string 2009/8/22 Alex Mcauley webmas...@thecarmarketplace.com In my quest to create a function that globaly tells a page when a request is going on with the ability to disable certain form elements i have been delving into

[Proto-Scripty] Re: Ajax.Responders

2009-08-22 Thread Vladimir Tkach
Sorry ignore my previous post 2009/8/22 Alex Mcauley webmas...@thecarmarketplace.com In my quest to create a function that globaly tells a page when a request is going on with the ability to disable certain form elements i have been delving into Ajax.Responders. I stumbled upon this page

[Proto-Scripty] Re: Ajax.Responders

2008-11-17 Thread T.J. Crowder
on!! Regards Alex - Original Message - From: T.J. Crowder [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Prototype script.aculo.us prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com Sent: Friday, November 14, 2008 12:02 PM Subject: [Proto-Scripty] Re: Ajax.Responders Hi, When creating an Ajax.Updater

[Proto-Scripty] Re: Ajax.Responders

2008-11-15 Thread T.J. Crowder
-Scripty] Re: Ajax.Responders Hi, When creating an Ajax.Updater for instance if you use the method onComplete in the Ajax.Options then it never unloads the Request from the Ajax.Responders counter Can you put together a small, self-contained test page demonstrating the issue, post

[Proto-Scripty] Re: Ajax.Responders

2008-11-14 Thread Alex Mcauley
-Scripty] Re: Ajax.Responders Hi, When creating an Ajax.Updater for instance if you use the method onComplete in the Ajax.Options then it never unloads the Request from the Ajax.Responders counter Can you put together a small, self-contained test page demonstrating the issue, post

[Proto-Scripty] Re: Ajax.Responders

2008-11-14 Thread Alex Mcauley
:02 PM Subject: [Proto-Scripty] Re: Ajax.Responders Hi, When creating an Ajax.Updater for instance if you use the method onComplete in the Ajax.Options then it never unloads the Request from the Ajax.Responders counter Can you put together a small, self-contained test page demonstrating

[Proto-Scripty] Re: Ajax.Responders

2008-10-07 Thread Justin Perkins
Are you getting any errors? What browser are you using? I think that code can be cleaned up a bit, $() is expensive, it should be used sparingly. Also there is no need to call appear on an already visible element. Ajax.Responders.register({ onCreate: function(request){ var loading =

[Proto-Scripty] Re: Ajax.Responders

2008-10-07 Thread Namotco
WebKit has a JS debugger much like Firebug, no errors. Here's the function I call that seems to no decrement the counter: function saveAllCEs() { $A(document.getElementsByClassName(editable)).each( function(ce){ new Ajax.Updater({ failure:

[Proto-Scripty] Re: Ajax.Responders

2008-10-07 Thread Justin Perkins
On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 2:50 PM, Namotco [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: WebKit has a JS debugger much like Firebug, no errors. I know, but I still find Firebug to be much better about error reporting. Here's the function I call that seems to no decrement the counter: If there is an error in that