if its any help the same thing happens in google chrome !!
- Original Message -
From: Cyrus arianglan...@googlemail.com
To: Prototype script.aculo.us prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2009 5:27 PM
Subject: [Proto-Scripty] Re: Opera and $$('.wrapper
PM
Subject: [Proto-Scripty] Re: Opera and $$('.wrapper .class') seems not to
work correctly
Prototype 1.6.0.3
Opera 9.63
On 12 Jan., 17:30, kangax kan...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jan 12, 10:37 am, Cyrus arianglan...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi there,
I have found a weird behaviour
...@googlemail.com
To: Prototype script.aculo.us prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2009 5:27 PM
Subject: [Proto-Scripty] Re: Opera and $$('.wrapper .class') seems not to
work correctly
Prototype 1.6.0.3
Opera 9.63
On 12 Jan., 17:30, kangax kan...@gmail.com wrote
I just used .class for this example. In my case I have a much more
complex HTML structure so it took me a while to actually find the bug.
If you're getting back one element, not two, it's a bug. The question
is, in what -- Prototype's selection code, Opera, or both? I lean
toward Opera bug.
On Jan 13, 6:26 am, Cyrus arianglan...@googlemail.com wrote:
[...]
What would you suggest? File a bug report at Opera, Prototype or both?
I can confirm this with 9.61 on Mac OSX. Here's a minimal failing test
case:
!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN
Hi Juriy,
That inline script could muddy the water in terms of DOM availability,
etc. Perhaps a minor mod:
!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN
http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd;
html
head
title/title
script src=http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/prototype/
Ok, thanks.
Unfortunately I cannot use the child selector in my case.
I'll write a bug report.
On 13 Jan., 14:20, kangax kan...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jan 13, 6:26 am, Cyrus arianglan...@googlemail.com wrote:
[...]
What would you suggest? File a bug report at Opera, Prototype or both?
I
On Jan 13, 8:30 am, T.J. Crowder t...@crowdersoftware.com wrote:
Hi Juriy,
That inline script could muddy the water in terms of DOM availability,
etc. Perhaps a minor mod:
I usually try to eliminate as much of irrelevant prototypeism as
possible when creating a testcase : ) Why use
I usually try to eliminate as much of irrelevant prototypeism as
possible when creating a testcase : )
Fair 'nuff, but I'd still use something other than inline to allow for
browsers being difficult about the closing body tag and DOM rendering
time. Probably me being paranoid. Perhaps (shock
Hey all, when you're replying to these threads, can you make sure you keep
it on-list? I like to keep up with various solutions to all these problems,
and seeing half the solution (or no solution at all) is really frustrating.
(@Kangax, I know I've seen a few replies to messages you've sent
On Jan 12, 10:37 am, Cyrus arianglan...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi there,
I have found a weird behaviour in the opera browser. I am not sure if
this is really a bug or an intended behaviour.
[...]
Which versions of Prototype.js and Opera?
--
kangax
11 matches
Mail list logo
