Hi Emily,
I just try the exemple in lighthub, but with IE6 (the only browser I
can use now), it work as expected for both exemple.
Does the problem come with a particular browser?
--
david
On 8 juil, 05:26, emz452 emz...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi there,
I have a sortable UL list using
Hi David,
Thanks for that.
I'm using firefox (the only browser I can use at the moment!) and
while both examples will sort, the drag and drop feel is very
different for each.
I will try to get onto a Windows PC later today and test it out on IE,
perhaps it is just a firefox issue.
Cheers,
Okay, just went and tested on IE and you're right, they both work
fine.
Thanks - it's helped narrow down the problem :)
On Jul 10, 10:02 am, emz452 emz...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi David,
Thanks for that.
I'm using firefox (the only browser I can use at the moment!) and
while both examples will
Yes, it says It is ported from Scriptaculous here:
http://mochikit.com/doc/html/MochiKit/Sortable.html
I am using this code in some portal so I can say its tested.
The only bad thing I've found so far with this sortable lists (and is
still giving me multiple headaches) is they way DND dont
I thought we were discussing the Prototype and Scriptaculous framework..what
is Mochikit and how is it related to Proto-Scripty?
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 2:47 PM, WLQ maybe...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks man! You've saved a lot of headache trouble!
Thanks, Bruno
+1 from Yan :)
In his initial message he said that MochiKit uses scriptaculous for this
type of thing, so it is exactly the same. Using Sortable.create() instead
of MochiKit.Sortable.Sortable.create() looks correct to me at any rate,
though I've never tested any of this.
Hi Programme,
that could be a lot of things, but one thougth, did you have same
element ID for the list ??
Perhaps, you could use pastie.org to paste created code.
--
david
On 13 mar, 15:09, Programme ejmyrv...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey
Here is a very nice tutorial on Sortable
