[Proto-Scripty] Re: Unofficial wiki content is invisible
Hi, Fine here, too, with Firefox 3.6.16, Chrome 10, and Opera 11 on both Linux and Windows, and with IE7, IE9, and Safari on Windows. My guess is an adblocker gone wrong, that kind of thing. Off-topic: Firefox 3.6.13 has some security holes that have been fixed by subsequent releases. Steer clear of 3.6.14 if you use any site with Java applets, but 3.6.15 and up are fine. Latest in the 3.x line is 3.6.16. Best, -- T.J. Crowder Independent Software Engineer tj / crowder software / com www / crowder software / com On Apr 12, 2:00 pm, Eric lefauv...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I don't know if it is me, but when I go to the unofficial wiki, most pages have no content except the usual wikidot advertising... For example, this page :http://proto-scripty.wikidot.com/prototype:how-to-bulletproof-ajax-re... I can see the code, but not the rendered page (I tried past revisions with the same result). I am using FF 3.6.13. Any idea about what is wrong? Eric -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Prototype script.aculo.us group. To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.
[Proto-Scripty] The Unofficial Wiki
Hi folks, As many of you know, we've had an unofficial Prototype script.aculo.us wiki for about 18 months: http://proto-scripty.wikidot.com/ I have a question for the community, but first a preamble. Preamble: In the last year (more, actually), there's been precisely one edit by someone other than me. :-) (Doug Reeder added an on0 handler to the bulletproof ajax page.) I wrote the vast majority of the articles and have been very nearly the only person maintaining them, not that there's been a lot to do on that front. (Don't get the impression I mind; I don't.) This suggests to me that - 1. We don't need a wiki or 2. We do, but it's too hard to contribute to that one because you have to request access and wait for it to be granted As a side note: Tobie and the core team are working on moving the main Prototype website to GitHub (don't worry, the URL doesn't change) from the current CMS it's on (Mephisto), and Tobie says that it will be a lot easier for people to contribute official content to the website once that's done. Question: Do we need a wiki with user-generated content? Or should we just move all of the relevant content to the Prototype website and make sure the process for contributing to the website is well-publicized, easy, and efficient? Thanks, -- T.J. Crowder Independent Software Consultant tj / crowder software / com www.crowdersoftware.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Prototype script.aculo.us group. To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptacul...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.
Re: [Proto-Scripty] The Unofficial Wiki
If it becomes easy to contribute to the official page then yes, that's the ideal answer as it's easier to find. If it wasn't for this group, I wouldn't have known about your wiki. On Apr 8, 2010, at 6:23 AM, T.J. Crowder t...@crowdersoftware.com wrote: Hi folks, As many of you know, we've had an unofficial Prototype script.aculo.us wiki for about 18 months: http://proto-scripty.wikidot.com/ I have a question for the community, but first a preamble. Preamble: In the last year (more, actually), there's been precisely one edit by someone other than me. :-) (Doug Reeder added an on0 handler to the bulletproof ajax page.) I wrote the vast majority of the articles and have been very nearly the only person maintaining them, not that there's been a lot to do on that front. (Don't get the impression I mind; I don't.) This suggests to me that - 1. We don't need a wiki or 2. We do, but it's too hard to contribute to that one because you have to request access and wait for it to be granted As a side note: Tobie and the core team are working on moving the main Prototype website to GitHub (don't worry, the URL doesn't change) from the current CMS it's on (Mephisto), and Tobie says that it will be a lot easier for people to contribute official content to the website once that's done. Question: Do we need a wiki with user-generated content? Or should we just move all of the relevant content to the Prototype website and make sure the process for contributing to the website is well-publicized, easy, and efficient? Thanks, -- T.J. Crowder Independent Software Consultant tj / crowder software / com www.crowdersoftware.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Prototype script.aculo.us group. To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptacul...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Prototype script.aculo.us group. To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptacul...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.
[Proto-Scripty] Re: Unofficial wiki - layout question
Hey TJ, My vote is lump it all together. Especially since scripty has its own wiki anyways, there are going to be sections that are really not relevant for scripty. Anyway, I think it makes sense to keep it primarily a prototype wiki, with general tips for other stuff and links out to the scriptaculous wiki where appropriate, which means your re-org pattern looks good :) -Jerod On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 7:25 AM, T.J. Crowder [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: Hi folks, The initial let's get something out there layout I did for the unofficial wiki[1] has a clear distinction between Prototype and script.aculo.us. There are separate sections for them, and each section has its own list of Tips, How Tos, etc. In fact, I even had us putting pages about Prototype in a prototype category and pages about script.aculo.us in a scripty category. [1] http://proto-scripty.wikidot.com Is there any point to that? I mean, is the tip about minimizing download times (or about unobtrusive JavaScript, or about instance methods as callbacks/event handlers) related to Prototype or script.aculo.us? My answer to that second question is Yes, both, which suggests that the answer to the first question is No, not really and we should get rid of it before things go on much further. (The site already has a bunch of stuff broken into these categories, so before things grow too much further...) Like many wikis, we can use tags on pages, and we've been careful to tag Prototype pages with a prototype tag, script.aculo.us pages with a script.aculo.us tag, and pages about both with both. I tend to think that's enough. So that would leave the menu on the left looking a bit like this: Home Tips How Tos Troubleshooting API Notes Extras / Add-ons Resources Pitch In! Editing this wiki ...followed by the mini-tag cloud. It's a biggish reorganization, getting rid of the categories and such, so I thought it best to throw the idea out and see if it makes sense. BTW: If you feel like pitching in, there's a list of things needed/ wanted here: http://proto-scripty.wikidot.com/pitch-in Thanks in advance, -- T.J. Crowder tj / crowder software / com -- Jerod Venema --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Prototype script.aculo.us group. To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
