On Jul 7, 7:22 am, KingKong99 wrote:
> very simple code
>
> li_date = "hello";
> $('log').innerHTML = li_date;
>
> it works very fine in all browsers but not in IE8 "Unknow runtime error"
You'll have to give people a bit more to go on than that. What kind of
element is "log", for instance?
"Unkn
Sorry that I gave you not enough coding. Actually , you are right. I
want to put "" inside this "".
I have changed it to and it is just working fine!!!
Thanks T.J.
On Jul 7, 2:44 pm, "T.J. Crowder" wrote:
> On Jul 7, 7:22 am, KingKong99 wrote:
>
> > very simple code
>
> > li_date = "hello";
>
I've used 409 (Conflict) a lot to signal back to my application that
an Ajax request went wrong at the server level (409 and Ajax are both
powerful household cleaner brands, so it's my private-joke-over-HTTP
status). But if I want to be semantic at the error code level, what
code best signa
On Jul 7, 12:42 pm, Walter Lee Davis wrote:
> I've used 409 (Conflict) a lot to signal back to my application that
> an Ajax request went wrong at the server level (409 and Ajax are both
> powerful household cleaner brands, so it's my private-joke-over-HTTP
> status). But if I want to be sem
On Jul 7, 2011, at 8:21 AM, T.J. Crowder wrote:
To my mind, HTTP response codes aren't for application logic
signalling. They're for signalling between the browser and server. The
correct response to bum data from the user is a 200 with an
application-logic-level success/error flag.
Fair eno
On Jul 7, 1:27 pm, Walter Lee Davis wrote:
> On Jul 7, 2011, at 8:21 AM, T.J. Crowder wrote:
>
> > To my mind, HTTP response codes aren't for application logic
> > signalling. They're for signalling between the browser and server. The
> > correct response to bum data from the user is a 200 with an
I tend to favor 1701 which is the bios generated error code for hard disk
drive / controller failure which was stolen from startrek NCC-1701 (saucer,
seperation, spin ups etc.) and when you got a 1701 error you were going no
where!
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 7:42 AM, Walter Lee Davis wrote:
> I've u
