I think there is some problem in your code, because code similar to your
description exists e.g. in Scriptaculous:
Effect.Base = Class.create({
position: null,
start: function(options) {
...
},
...
});
Effect.Parallel = Class.create(Effect.Base, {
initialize: function(effects) {
Problem is somehow related to XHTML and IE9.
If you occasionally serve document as xhtml+xml, document should pass
validation to work in browser. I've noticed in your
example, but *name* attribute is obsolete for *form* tag in XHTML1.0, or
maybe you have * * somewhere in your markup.
You can
On Oct 27, 3:46 pm, Victor wrote:
> I think there is some problem in your code...
I suspect so as well, which is why a couple of days ago I asked him to
post a self-contained example to http://jsbin.com.
-- T.J. ;-)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
obsolete attributes "should" be ignored. I used the form name attribute as
a way of knowing which AJAX module to call on behalf of that form. That
allows my dofill() to serve many forms.
I've seen very few pages of any type that validates 100% and browsers
accomodate this and that's one reason w
>
> I used the form name attribute as a way of knowing which AJAX module to
> call on behalf of that form. That allows my dofill() to serve many forms.
>
This can be made via CSS classes, not name attributes.
I've seen very few pages of any type that validates 100%
>
1-2 errors/warnings does
I've seen on github that event system is reworked, but this is still work
in progress. You can download bleeding-edge version and test for yourself.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Prototype & script.aculo.us" group.
To view this discussion on the w
Jon Dow == John Doe? ;)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Prototype & script.aculo.us" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/prototype-scriptaculous/-/2jp7KMInIvAJ.
To post to this group, send email to prototy