Actually you're right, it is fine in this case to your afterFinish.
However, in some cases, I have a lot of code I want to execute after
the animation.
Still, I try to do the trick (not finished yet).
On 21 août, 15:43, "T.J. Crowder" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Why not just use the afterFinish on the effect itself? I don't see
> the need for queuing here.
>
> To fade and remove, I think this should do it (note I'm using fade,
> not toggle):
>
> $('invitation_row_1').fade({
> duration: 0.5,
> afterFinish: function(effect) {
> effect.element.remove();
> }
> });
>
> HTH,
> --
> T.J. Crowder
> tj / crowder software / com
> Independent Software Engineer, consulting services available
>
> On Aug 21, 11:40 am, tomkiller44 wrote:
>
>
>
> > Hi,
>
> > I am using Scriptaculous through RoR and still be confused with the
> > queue and Effect.Event.
> > I want to fade out a row in a table before removing it from the DOM.
>
> > I do this:
>
> > Effect.toggle("invitation_row_1",'appear',{duration:0.5,
> > queue:'remove'});
> > new Effect.Event({queue: 'remove', afterFinish:function(){
> > Element.remove("invitation_row_1");
>
> > }}
>
> > The row is deleted without (or before) any fading effect.
>
> > Has someone any idea why removal does not wait until effect
> > completion?
>
> > Cheers,
>
> > Thomas
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Prototype & script.aculo.us" group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
