On samedi 12 décembre 2009, disccomp wrote:
> A good reason to get out of the habit of using document.write, is that
> it is NOT supported by XHTML.[1]
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/2004/xhtml-faq#docwrite
When using document.write() in XHTML documents, it clears the entire page
and writes t
A good reason to get out of the habit of using document.write, is that
it is NOT supported by XHTML.[1]
[1] http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/2004/xhtml-faq#docwrite
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Prototype & script.aculo.us" group.
To post to this group, s
Hi All,
I think that for an insertion of one element in the DOM (or a few
numbers of elements), if you would keep reference to the element, it
could be easier with DOM js methods.
For cross browser insertion, innerHTML is now equivalent in all
brothers, i think ::))
--
david
On 11 déc, 05:04, Wal
I believe that innerhtml is not completely guaranteed to work the same
way across browsers, while the Prototype DOM methods are.
Walter
On Dec 10, 2009, at 10:02 PM, Rob Cluett wrote:
> Why would we add an element using prototype's DOM method over
> innerhtml in any scenario if we can use in
Why would we add an element using prototype's DOM method over innerhtml in
any scenario if we can use innerhtml and subsequently use $(element) to
immediately retrieve a reference to it? I was told in the begining that
innerhtml was the wrong way.
Message sent from my Motorola Droid.
On Dec 8, 20
Hi all,
> I was under the impression that it would not actually be added to the DOM
> when using innerhtml. And it therefore cannot be manipulated as a DOM
> element.
In fact, it's faster than any JS implementation, prototype or other.
Browser are optimize to parse HTML string in an unbeatable w
Le lundi 7 décembre 2009 15:22, Rob Cluett a écrit :
> I was under the impression that it would not actually be added to the DOM
> when using innerhtml. And it therefore cannot be manipulated as a DOM
> element.
I don't know, but in my case, I prefer using DOM, because it is easier to
add featur
I was under the impression that it would not actually be added to the DOM
when using innerhtml. And it therefore cannot be manipulated as a DOM
element.
Message sent from my Motorola Droid.
On Dec 7, 2009 7:26 AM, "david" wrote:
Hi All,
This is not the original question, but to insert elements
cripty] Re: document.write() vs Element/appendChild()
Le lundi 7 décembre 2009 11:00, Alex McAuley a écrit :
> There is a known bug in IE8 regarding new Element and adding the class
> toit in the scope...
>
> To overcome it simply use addClassName('My-Class'); after or instead o
"Prototype & script.aculo.us"
> <prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com>
> Sent: Monday, December 07, 2009 10:53 AM
> Subject: [Proto-Scripty] Re: document.write() vs Element/appendChild()
>
> On Dec 4, 10:36 pm, fma <f...@gbiloba.org> wrote:
> &
Le lundi 7 décembre 2009 11:00, Alex McAuley a écrit :
> There is a known bug in IE8 regarding new Element and adding the class
> toit in the scope...
>
> To overcome it simply use addClassName('My-Class'); after or instead of
> the scope
Ok, thank you all for your help. I just added a call to ad
al Message -
> From: "ColinFine"
> To: "Prototype & script.aculo.us"
> Sent: Monday, December 07, 2009 10:53 AM
> Subject: [Proto-Scripty] Re: document.write() vs Element/appendChild()
>
> On Dec 4, 10:36 pm, fma wrote:
> > Ok, I found something...
&
uot;
To: "Prototype & script.aculo.us"
Sent: Monday, December 07, 2009 10:53 AM
Subject: [Proto-Scripty] Re: document.write() vs Element/appendChild()
On Dec 4, 10:36 pm, fma wrote:
> Ok, I found something...
>
> If I look at the HTML tree in the IE debugger, on the left panel I
On Dec 4, 10:36 pm, fma wrote:
> Ok, I found something...
>
> If I look at the HTML tree in the IE debugger, on the left panel I
> can't see any 'class' attribute. However, it does appear on the right
> panel (called Attributs), with the correct value. But IE does not
> seems to use it. I found
So, does anybody understand why the full new-style element creation
does not work well under IE?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Prototype & script.aculo.us" group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptacul...@googlegroups.com.
To uns
I re-write my code using this syntax:
this.mask = new Element('div');
this.mask.setAttribute('id', this._name + "_mask");
this.mask.setAttribute('class', "fullMask");
document.body.appendChild(this.mask);
instead of:
this.mask = new Element('div', {'id': this._name + "_mask", 'class':
"fullMask"
Ok, I found something...
If I look at the HTML tree in the IE debugger, on the left panel I
can't see any 'class' attribute. However, it does appear on the right
panel (called Attributs), with the correct value. But IE does not
seems to use it. I found that I can add an attribute to the div in the
Very usefull site, thanks.
Does someone have an idea of my problem?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Prototype & script.aculo.us" group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptacul...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, se
When you have a large piece of code to post, it is nice to also post a
link on
pastie.org or jsbin.com.
For example, I pasted the code you've posted on pastie here:
http://pastie.org/727583
Eric
On Dec 4, 8:09 am, fma wrote:
> BTW, what is the tag to format code on this group?
--
You receive
There isn't one
Alex Mcauley
http://www.thevacancymarket.com
- Original Message -
From: "fma"
To: "Prototype & script.aculo.us"
Sent: Friday, December 04, 2009 7:09 AM
Subject: [Proto-Scripty] Re: document.write() vs Element/appendChild()
> BTW, what i
BTW, what is the tag to format code on this group?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Prototype & script.aculo.us" group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptacul...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
proto
21 matches
Mail list logo
