at 1:27 AM, wrote:
>
>> I think android specified by Joe still †ђξ production options Jimmy.
>> Sent from my BlackBerry wireless device from MTN
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: "joe t."
>> Sender: prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com
>
ype & script.aculo.us
> Reply-To: prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com
> Subject: [Proto-Scripty] Re: mobile solution?
>
> Er, Android 2.3.7 ... D'oh!
>
> On Nov 18, 9:43 pm, "joe t." wrote:
> > i may have the wrong impression, but my tinkering on scripty&
-To: prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com
Subject: [Proto-Scripty] Re: mobile solution?
Er, Android 2.3.7 ... D'oh!
On Nov 18, 9:43 pm, "joe t." wrote:
> i may have the wrong impression, but my tinkering on scripty's demo
> page has been...unimpressive. i'm us
That's to bad .. hopefully someone will come along soon and tell us
different. ...
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 6:44 PM, joe t. wrote:
> Er, Android 2.3.7 ... D'oh!
>
> On Nov 18, 9:43 pm, "joe t." wrote:
> > i may have the wrong impression, but my tinkering on scripty's demo
> > page has been...uni
Er, Android 2.3.7 ... D'oh!
On Nov 18, 9:43 pm, "joe t." wrote:
> i may have the wrong impression, but my tinkering on scripty's demo
> page has been...unimpressive. i'm using Android 2.4 & so far, hardly
> any of the mobile/touch demos work. In fact, from the touch-demo page:
>
> "These demos ar
i may have the wrong impression, but my tinkering on scripty's demo
page has been...unimpressive. i'm using Android 2.4 & so far, hardly
any of the mobile/touch demos work. In fact, from the touch-demo page:
"These demos are optimized for the Starlight browser, iPhone Safari
3+, Desktop Safari 4+
