Re: [Proto-Scripty] Re: 4 different browsers - 4 different responses
One thing to add here (in agreement with TJ) is that Prototype demands a valid page in order to work predictably. If a particular page or effect won't work correctly, the answer might be in the HTML or it might be in the JavaScript. And they're both valid points to discuss here, in my opinion, because they bear on getting the framework to, well, work. Walter On Aug 17, 2010, at 11:15 AM, T.J. Crowder wrote: I don't see how this went too far afield at all -- at least not nearly enough to bother to comment on it. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Prototype & script.aculo.us" group. To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptacul...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.
[OT] Use the list properly. Please [WAS] Re: [Proto-Scripty] Re: 4 different browsers - 4 different responses
On 17 August 2010 07:32, Lapis wrote: > Oh hai ;) > > Interesting as it may be.. > does prototype.js or scriptaculous have anything to do Witherspoon > this? Or did I just subscribe to some random HTML/HTTP chat? > > Sorry, getting morning coffee now... > > /P No, you are right. I sometimes think that everything I do on the client side is to do with Prototype. The same argument was just raised at http://news.php.net/php.db/47310, so it isn't just this list that suffers from subscribers having a mental block on the reason for the list's existence. Please accept my apologies. As my school reports always said ... "Could try harder.". Richard. -- Richard Quadling. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Prototype & script.aculo.us" group. To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptacul...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.
Re: [Proto-Scripty] Re: 4 different browsers - 4 different responses
On 14 August 2010 00:39, T.J. Crowder wrote: > Hi, > >> I know that target is a no-no for standards (and it seems IE is the >> only one obeying it this time around!). > > How is `target` on an `a` element not standard? > http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/links.html#attr-hyperlink-target > http://reference.sitepoint.com/html/a/target says ... "The target attribute is deprecated and its use as a layout mechanism, like that of the frameset, is no longer common." I want the PDF to NOT overwrite the current page. New tab, new window or external app - any of these (in that order of preference). But it seems I was testing the wrong code. Doh! -- Richard Quadling. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Prototype & script.aculo.us" group. To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptacul...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.
