really think none of the Javascript is executing on the server?
From: prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com
[mailto:prototype-scriptacul...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Phil Petree
Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2010 1:43 PM
To: prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [Pr
I've been thinking about this... kinda nagging at me in the back of my
mind...
Why not use AJAX to make a SOAP call? The SOAP call would make the call to
the fbapi completely transparent.
One article here:
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/webservices/library/ws-wsajax/
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at
Javascript can be executed on the server in Ajax. The un-nested version I
documented in my last email runs fine.
If I run the Ajax.updater without nesting two calls, the first call executes
fine on the server loading Javascript and executing. When the response comes
back however, it is loaded with
First, Thanks very much for your reply.
Sorry for not being more precise.
The Index.html or any other web page on the site would have the statement:
There is a div in the body of Index.html that is the target:
The file fbsidebar.html is a standard Facebook plugin as follows.
http://www.w3.
