Re: [psas-airframe] OreSat Structure Meeting Time

2017-04-22 Thread Joseph Shields
I forgot to send out an email about this earlier, but the OreSat structure
meeting on this particular Saturday isn't going to be a thing. That's
because the march for science is a thing at the same time. Sorry for the
super short notice.


On Apr 16, 2017 10:35 AM, "Jeremy Louke"  wrote:

yeah, that's why I didn't push it too hard, we already use enough programs.
However I think it may be beneficial in this case to transfer all CAD to
grabCAD, and leave github to the electrical engineers and programmers.

I sent you an invite to the grabCAD project I made for oresat. go ahead and
download the desktop app, and play with it and let me know what you think.

the march for science should be pretty good, I am excited for it.


On Apr 16, 2017 10:06 AM, "Joseph Shields"  wrote:

> it may be easier to use grabCAD. It is a similar to git in the sense that
it is revision control, however it is geared towards CAD. One of the most
useful functions is; a user can checkout a file (or group) and it locks
that file from other users editing it.

Yeah, that may be a good solution. I'm a little wary of bringing in *even
more* tools, but it would be good to have something other than "let's agree
to only edit these parts".

> march for science

Agh, that's right. It's the same day and time here too...

-- Joe Shields 

On Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 9:25 AM, Jeremy Louke  wrote:

> if there is a problem with conflicts because of a lot of people working on
> an assembly, it may be easier to use grabCAD. It is a similar to git in the
> sense that it is revision control, however it is geared towards CAD. One of
> the most useful functions is; a user can checkout a file (or group) and it
> locks that file from other users editing it. I set it up with a previous
> revision of the Oresat structure, but I never really utilized it because i
> was the only one doing the CAD back then. I was however thinking of having
> both PSAS and Oresat switch all CAD to grabCAD at one point because it is
> better suited to CAD than github.
>
> Maybe it's something we should revisit with so many people all working on
> one assembly.
>
> I unfortunately won't be able to join this weekend, as I am going to the
> march for science in LA.
>
>
> On Apr 16, 2017 7:46 AM, "Joseph Shields"  wrote:
>
>> It looks like the best time for the OreSat structure meeting would be
>> Saturday morning. So, let’s plan to meet at *10 am on Saturday* in the
>> rocket room and/or the hangout .
>>
>> I added some later times to the poll and forgot to tell anyone. So, if
>> you really want the meeting to be at one of those later times, I guess you
>> can give a holla.
>>
>> I think the main stuff we want to do at this meeting is help each other
>> with any clarifications and *pick some parts to convert before the next
>> meeting*. (It might also be good to talk about what we plan to change,
>> so we don’t constantly create merge conflicts with the assemblies. We could
>> also just use branches for this.)
>> day time max yes maybe max non-no
>> Thu. 12-2 pm 4 1 4
>> Fri. 6-7 pm 4 0 4
>> *Sat.* *10 am-1 pm* 4 2 *5*
>> Sat. 4-7 pm 4 0 4
>> Sun. 5-7 pm 4 0 4
>>
>> The reason for choosing this time is to get all the people who are
>> working on converting the model to attend. (And also just to get the
>> maximum number of people to attend.)
>> ​
>>
>> -- Joe Shields 
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 9:21 PM, Joseph Shields  wrote:
>>
>>> Hey airframe list,
>>> We need to pick a new time for the OreSat strucutre meeting
>>> , since the old one doesn’t
>>> work any more didn’t work. As usual, this isn’t a poll for the
>>> *specific* days you’re free, but rather the *day’s of the week* you’re
>>> usually free.
>>>
>>> In the near future this is just a time to all sit down with SolidWorks
>>> and get each other unstuck or assign parts to migrate. In the less near
>>> future, this is about designing the antenna deployment.
>>> ​
>>> -- Joe Shields 
>>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> psas-airframe mailing list
>> psas-airframe@lists.psas.pdx.edu
>> http://lists.psas.pdx.edu/mailman/listinfo/psas-airframe
>>
>>
___
psas-airframe mailing list
psas-airframe@lists.psas.pdx.edu
http://lists.psas.pdx.edu/mailman/listinfo/psas-airframe


Re: [psas-airframe] OreSat Structure Meeting Time

2017-04-16 Thread Joseph Shields
> it may be easier to use grabCAD. It is a similar to git in the sense that
it is revision control, however it is geared towards CAD. One of the most
useful functions is; a user can checkout a file (or group) and it locks
that file from other users editing it.

Yeah, that may be a good solution. I'm a little wary of bringing in *even
more* tools, but it would be good to have something other than "let's agree
to only edit these parts".

> march for science

Agh, that's right. It's the same day and time here too...

-- Joe Shields 

On Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 9:25 AM, Jeremy Louke  wrote:

> if there is a problem with conflicts because of a lot of people working on
> an assembly, it may be easier to use grabCAD. It is a similar to git in the
> sense that it is revision control, however it is geared towards CAD. One of
> the most useful functions is; a user can checkout a file (or group) and it
> locks that file from other users editing it. I set it up with a previous
> revision of the Oresat structure, but I never really utilized it because i
> was the only one doing the CAD back then. I was however thinking of having
> both PSAS and Oresat switch all CAD to grabCAD at one point because it is
> better suited to CAD than github.
>
> Maybe it's something we should revisit with so many people all working on
> one assembly.
>
> I unfortunately won't be able to join this weekend, as I am going to the
> march for science in LA.
>
>
> On Apr 16, 2017 7:46 AM, "Joseph Shields"  wrote:
>
>> It looks like the best time for the OreSat structure meeting would be
>> Saturday morning. So, let’s plan to meet at *10 am on Saturday* in the
>> rocket room and/or the hangout .
>>
>> I added some later times to the poll and forgot to tell anyone. So, if
>> you really want the meeting to be at one of those later times, I guess you
>> can give a holla.
>>
>> I think the main stuff we want to do at this meeting is help each other
>> with any clarifications and *pick some parts to convert before the next
>> meeting*. (It might also be good to talk about what we plan to change,
>> so we don’t constantly create merge conflicts with the assemblies. We could
>> also just use branches for this.)
>> day time max yes maybe max non-no
>> Thu. 12-2 pm 4 1 4
>> Fri. 6-7 pm 4 0 4
>> *Sat.* *10 am-1 pm* 4 2 *5*
>> Sat. 4-7 pm 4 0 4
>> Sun. 5-7 pm 4 0 4
>>
>> The reason for choosing this time is to get all the people who are
>> working on converting the model to attend. (And also just to get the
>> maximum number of people to attend.)
>> ​
>>
>> -- Joe Shields 
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 9:21 PM, Joseph Shields  wrote:
>>
>>> Hey airframe list,
>>> We need to pick a new time for the OreSat strucutre meeting
>>> , since the old one doesn’t
>>> work any more didn’t work. As usual, this isn’t a poll for the
>>> *specific* days you’re free, but rather the *day’s of the week* you’re
>>> usually free.
>>>
>>> In the near future this is just a time to all sit down with SolidWorks
>>> and get each other unstuck or assign parts to migrate. In the less near
>>> future, this is about designing the antenna deployment.
>>> ​
>>> -- Joe Shields 
>>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> psas-airframe mailing list
>> psas-airframe@lists.psas.pdx.edu
>> http://lists.psas.pdx.edu/mailman/listinfo/psas-airframe
>>
>>
___
psas-airframe mailing list
psas-airframe@lists.psas.pdx.edu
http://lists.psas.pdx.edu/mailman/listinfo/psas-airframe


Re: [psas-airframe] OreSat Structure Meeting Time

2017-04-16 Thread Joseph Shields
It looks like the best time for the OreSat structure meeting would be
Saturday morning. So, let’s plan to meet at *10 am on Saturday* in the
rocket room and/or the hangout .

I added some later times to the poll and forgot to tell anyone. So, if you
really want the meeting to be at one of those later times, I guess you can
give a holla.

I think the main stuff we want to do at this meeting is help each other
with any clarifications and *pick some parts to convert before the next
meeting*. (It might also be good to talk about what we plan to change, so
we don’t constantly create merge conflicts with the assemblies. We could
also just use branches for this.)
day time max yes maybe max non-no
Thu. 12-2 pm 4 1 4
Fri. 6-7 pm 4 0 4
*Sat.* *10 am-1 pm* 4 2 *5*
Sat. 4-7 pm 4 0 4
Sun. 5-7 pm 4 0 4

The reason for choosing this time is to get all the people who are working
on converting the model to attend. (And also just to get the maximum number
of people to attend.)
​

-- Joe Shields 

On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 9:21 PM, Joseph Shields  wrote:

> Hey airframe list,
> We need to pick a new time for the OreSat strucutre meeting
> , since the old one doesn’t work
> any more didn’t work. As usual, this isn’t a poll for the *specific* days
> you’re free, but rather the *day’s of the week* you’re usually free.
>
> In the near future this is just a time to all sit down with SolidWorks and
> get each other unstuck or assign parts to migrate. In the less near future,
> this is about designing the antenna deployment.
> ​
> -- Joe Shields 
>
___
psas-airframe mailing list
psas-airframe@lists.psas.pdx.edu
http://lists.psas.pdx.edu/mailman/listinfo/psas-airframe


[psas-airframe] OreSat Structure Meeting Time

2017-04-10 Thread Joseph Shields
Hey airframe list,
We need to pick a new time for the OreSat strucutre meeting
, since the old one doesn’t work
any more didn’t work. As usual, this isn’t a poll for the *specific* days
you’re free, but rather the *day’s of the week* you’re usually free.

In the near future this is just a time to all sit down with SolidWorks and
get each other unstuck or assign parts to migrate. In the less near future,
this is about designing the antenna deployment.
​
-- Joe Shields 
___
psas-airframe mailing list
psas-airframe@lists.psas.pdx.edu
http://lists.psas.pdx.edu/mailman/listinfo/psas-airframe