OK, upon reading my message back, yes, perhaps it was a little too
scathing, so I would like to publicly apologise for that. My aim was
not to cause offense. The fact is, however, it took me a very long
time to read your email in full, and about 90% of the information in
there was you telling a
Google Voice: (Please use sparingly):
980-272-8570
- Original Message -
From: TheOreoMonster
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2012 10:48 PM
Subject: Re: Question about monitoring vocals
Two suggestions. A) have someone sighted next to you while
I just input at around -10, and insert the comp while recording, which will
crank up the output gain to a desirable level. It's just a matter of
preference. I prefer recording with some effects on to help the process along.
I never use direct monitoring because I like having the PT effects running
during my recording sessions. The latency isn't really that bad, it's just part
of the process. Plus, if I were to use direct monitoring, I lose out on any
panning I've done in PT to see how other tracks I'm recording
from any standard fax machine:
704-697-2069
Google Voice: (Please use sparingly):
980-272-8570
- Original Message -
From: Kevin Reeves reeves...@gmail.com
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2012 9:36 AM
Subject: Re: Question about monitoring vocals
I just
reeves...@gmail.com
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2012 9:42 AM
Subject: Re: Question about monitoring vocals
I never use direct monitoring because I like having the PT effects running
during my recording sessions. The latency isn't really that bad, it's just
part
Message - From: Kevin Reeves reeves...@gmail.com
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2012 9:36 AM
Subject: Re: Question about monitoring vocals
I just input at around -10, and insert the comp while recording, which will
crank up the output gain to a desirable
-2069
Google Voice: (Please use sparingly):
980-272-8570
- Original Message - From: Kevin Reeves reeves...@gmail.com
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2012 9:36 AM
Subject: Re: Question about monitoring vocals
I just input at around -10, and insert
-
From: Kevin Reeves reeves...@gmail.com
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2012 12:14 PM
Subject: Re: Question about monitoring vocals
I wouldn't record with Autotune running as it eats up processor and can
throw off your vocal while you're singing. But your COmpressor
OK, this may seem like quite an elementary question, and a lot of you
probably are gonna look at me and think I'm nuts for asking, but here's my
situation.
I have a pare of head phones which I've been using for a while now. I'm not
gonna sit here and lie to you guies. They're IFrogs.
OK, no offense, but I got bored of reading half way through the message, but
here it is:
I'm not a pro, but I always thought you got the original signal as loud as
possible without clipping. Personally, I head for as close to 0db on that gain
indicator as possible, usually stopping level
actually since we are recording in digital and at 24 bits there is no reason to
record as loud as you can with out clipping anymore. That was what you had to
do in the analog days to make sure the audio was up over the noise floor of
tape or you would hear the tape hiss during what you were
Well, frankly, yes, I did! take offense. How else was I supposed to explain my
issue, if I didn't explain how I was doing things? I'm not going to get
anywhere if I don't specifically explain what I'm doing so you all can see my
mistake, but in fear of being oh, whoops? gasp! to lengthy, with
standard fax machine:
704-697-2069
Google Voice: (Please use sparingly):
980-272-8570
- Original Message -
From: TheOreoMonster
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2012 9:47 PM
Subject: Re: Question about monitoring vocals
actually since we are recording
14 matches
Mail list logo
