egroups.com] On Behalf
> Of TheOreoMonster
> Sent: Sunday, May 31, 2015 5:33 PM
> To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
> Subject: Re: accessibility comparison chart
>
> Only if they have a Mac VST version available.
>> On May 31, 2015, at 4:28 PM, Poppa Bear > <mailto:heaven
I think that I have enough, plus, so many sites offer free VST’s
From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of
TheOreoMonster
Sent: Sunday, May 31, 2015 5:33 PM
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: accessibility comparison chart
Only if they have a
m [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
> Of TheOreoMonster
> Sent: Sunday, May 31, 2015 5:34 AM
> To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
> Subject: Re: accessibility comparison chart
>
> Everything you need to know about reaper on the mac can be found at
> ReaperAccess.com <http:
: Re: accessibility comparison chart
Everything you need to know about reaper on the mac can be found at
ReaperAccess.com. Much is available to VOiceOver out of the box, But with the
plug in and the custom Keycap found for it on the aforementioned website, it
becomes a lot more efficient to
oglegroups.com <mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com>
> Subject: Re: accessibility comparison chart
>
> I think what would be more useful is a table with the list of things and a
> link to steps to accomplish those tasks in each DAW. This will give anyone
> the ability to judge for th
egroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
> Of TheOreoMonster
> Sent: Saturday, May 30, 2015 10:37 AM
> To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
> Subject: Re: accessibility comparison chart
>
>
>
> I think what would be more useful is a table with the list of things and
: accessibility comparison chart
I think what would be more useful is a table with the list of things and a link
to steps to accomplish those tasks in each DAW. This will give anyone the
ability to judge for themselves which workflow works better. But owing to what
Scott said, a simple yes no table
ok.com/jeanphilipperykiel
>>>
>>> Le 30/05/2015 11:19, Christopher-Mark Gilland a écrit :
>>>> First off, I think this would honestly render much better as a table
>>>> than it would as a chart.
>>>>
>>>> Chris.
>>>>
>
er-Mark Gilland a écrit :
>>> First off, I think this would honestly render much better as a table
>>> than it would as a chart.
>>>
>>> Chris.
>>>
>>> - Original Message - From: "Jean-Philippe Rykiel"
>>>
>>>
this would honestly render much better as a table
>> than it would as a chart.
>>
>> Chris.
>>
>> - Original Message - From: "Jean-Philippe Rykiel"
>>
>> To: ;
>> Sent: Saturday, May 30, 2015 5:13 AM
>> Subject: accessibility com
it would as a chart.
Chris.
- Original Message - From: "Jean-Philippe Rykiel"
To: ;
Sent: Saturday, May 30, 2015 5:13 AM
Subject: accessibility comparison chart
Hi all.
excuse me for posting to both lists, It is something I never do, but
you will obviously understand why
First off, I think this would honestly render much better as a table than it
would as a chart.
Chris.
- Original Message -
From: "Jean-Philippe Rykiel"
To: ;
Sent: Saturday, May 30, 2015 5:13 AM
Subject: accessibility comparison chart
Hi all.
excuse me for posting to
Hi all.
excuse me for posting to both lists, It is something I never do, but you
will obviously understand why.
I wonder, For users who have a hard time choosing between ProTools and
logic, if It would be possible to set up an accessibility comparison
chart between both Daws, including
13 matches
Mail list logo
