On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 08:51:02PM +0100, Marco Cavallini wrote:
> But I faced to the same problem with 1.0.1
> so the answer is which ptx version does successfully build xorg ?
1.0.1 shouldn't have this problem. It is identical to 1.0.0, but without
some of the bugs. Nevertheless, it is based on
Robert Schwebel ha scritto:
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 08:16:24PM +0100, Marco Cavallini wrote:
>> thank you for answering.
>>
>> Do you mean that nobody has successfully built xorg since now ?
>
> 1.99.0 has xorg 7.3 and yes, it is still work in progress.
>
> Robert
ack
But I faced to the same
On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 08:16:24PM +0100, Marco Cavallini wrote:
> thank you for answering.
>
> Do you mean that nobody has successfully built xorg since now ?
1.99.0 has xorg 7.3 and yes, it is still work in progress.
Robert
--
Dipl.-Ing. Robert Schwebel | http://www.pengutronix.de
Pengutroni
Robert Schwebel ha scritto:
>
> Have a look at the .in file - an important "select" statement was
> commented out.
>
> The problem is that with that select the kconfig tree becomes very
> large, leading to ptxdist startup times which are not really acceptable.
>
> We didn't find a solution yet - pa
On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 06:24:41PM +0100, Marco Cavallini wrote:
> I'm trying to build xorg with ptx-1.99.0
Ah, great. I didn't write an announcement for it yet, but 1.99.x is a
preview series for the upcomming ptxdist-2.x.
> but I face to the following error.
>
> Does anybody could share his/h
Hi,
I'm trying to build xorg with ptx-1.99.0
but I face to the following error.
Does anybody could share his/her valid ptxconfig file so I can learn
which missing options are defintely required by xorg ?
TIA
-
target: host-xorg-lib-x11.prepare
---
