On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 03:21:08PM +0200, Michael Olbrich wrote:
> Clemens: I think a patch that adds xtables-version.h is the cleanest
> solution. The resulting m_xt.so will be broken because it doesn't link to
> libiptables but we don't install that right now.
Good idea! I'll send a patch shortl
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 03:13:49PM +0200, Michael Olbrich wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 02:54:51PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 12:48:37PM +0200, Clemens Gruber wrote:
> > > What's also interesting to me is that Debian does not depend on
> > > libxtables11, it
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 02:54:51PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 12:48:37PM +0200, Clemens Gruber wrote:
> > What's also interesting to me is that Debian does not depend on
> > libxtables11, it is only recommended.
> Looking at iproute2 4.6.0-4, it build-depends on i
Hello,
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 12:48:37PM +0200, Clemens Gruber wrote:
> What's also interesting to me is that Debian does not depend on
> libxtables11, it is only recommended.
Looking at iproute2 4.6.0-4, it build-depends on iptables-dev though. So
maybe only the headers are needed, but not the l
Hi Alex, Hi Michael, Hi Juergen,
I am interested in your opinion regarding the iptables
dependency.
I sent a hack-ish patch to not build tc/m_ipt.c, but there is probably a
better way. Especially if someone needs the iptables support in tc.
(For the tc filter ipt action)
Should we better
1) bit
