D-Trust votes “YES” on ballot FORUM-17.
Thanks,
Enrico
Von: Public mailto:public-boun...@cabforum.org>>
Im Auftrag von Ben Wilson via Public
Gesendet: Thursday, December 16, 2021 7:40 PM
An: CA/Browser Forum Public Discussion List
mailto:public@cabforum.org>>
Betreff: [cabfpub] Voting Period
D-TRUST votes YES on Special Ballot Forum-16.
Thanks,
Enrico
Von: Public Im Auftrag von Dean Coclin via Public
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 22. Oktober 2020 04:15
An: CABforum1
Betreff: [cabfpub] Voting begins on Special Ballot Forum-16: Election of
CA/Browser Forum Vice Chair
Voting begins on this
D-TRUST votes „YES“ on Special Ballot Forum-15.
Thanks,
Enrico
On 2020-09-14 6:11 μ.μ., Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA) via Public wrote:
Voting begins for Special Ballot Forum-15.
Dimitris.
On 2020-09-07 8:53 μ.μ., Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA) wrote:
The following motion has been
D-TRUST votes YES on Ballot Forum-14 version 2.
Thanks,
Enrico
Von: Public Im Auftrag von Tim Hollebeek via
Public
Gesendet: Montag, 8. Juni 2020 22:52
An: CABforum1
Betreff: [cabfpub] VOTING BEGINS: Ballot Forum-14 version 2: Creation of S/MIME
Certificates Working Group
The following
D-TRUST votes YES on ballot Forum-12.
Regards,
Enrico
Von: Public Im Auftrag von Dimitris Zacharopoulos
(HARICA) via Public
Gesendet: Montag, 18. Mai 2020 17:30
An: public@cabforum.org
Betreff: [cabfpub] Voting Begins for ballot Forum-12 - Update CA/B Forum Bylaws
The following motion has
D-TRUST votes YES on Ballot SC6 v3.
Regards,
Enrico
Von: Public Im Auftrag von Wayne Thayer via Public
Gesendet: Montag, 10. September 2018 20:54
An: CA/B Forum Server Certificate WG Public Discussion List
Cc: CA/Browser Forum Public Discussion List
Betreff: Re: [cabfpub] Ballot SC6 v3 -
D-TRUST votes YES.
Regards,
Enrico
Von: Public Im Auftrag von Kirk Hall via Public
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 30. August 2018 17:01
An: CA/Browser Forum Public Discussion List
Betreff: [cabfpub] Ballot SC8: Election of Server Certificate Working Group
Chair
Ballot SC8: Election of Server
D-TRUST votes YES on ballot SC3 version 2.
Regards
Enrico
Von: Public Im Auftrag von Tim Hollebeek via
Public
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 9. August 2018 17:48
An: CA/Browser Forum Public Discussion List
Cc: servercert...@cabforum.org
Betreff: [cabfpub] Voting begins: Ballot SC3 version 2
D-TRUST votes YES on Ballot SC2.
We see the need for additional validation methods. An improvement of the
methods should be carried out in a short time in a next ballot.
Enrico
Von: Public Im Auftrag von Tim Hollebeek via
Public
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 19. Juli 2018 17:03
An:
D-TRUST votes „YES“ on ballot 224.
Enrico
Von: Public Im Auftrag von Wayne Thayer via Public
Gesendet: Dienstag, 15. Mai 2018 21:22
An: CA/Browser Forum Public Discussion List
Betreff: [cabfpub] Voting Begins: Ballot 224: WHOIS and RDAP
Ballot
D-TRUST votes YES on Ballot 223 v2
Enrico Entschew
D-TRUST GmbH
Von: Public Im Auftrag von Dimitris Zacharopoulos
via Public
Gesendet: Montag, 7. Mai 2018 23:49
An: public@cabforum.org
Betreff: [cabfpub] Voting begins for Ballot 223 v2 - Update BR Section 8.4 for
D-TRUST votes YES to Ballot 219
Von: Public Im Auftrag von Corey Bonnell via
Public
Gesendet: Dienstag, 3. April 2018 18:13
An: public@cabforum.org
Betreff: [cabfpub] Voting Begins: Ballot 219 v2: Clarify handling of CAA Record
Sets with no "issue"/"issuewild"
Hi Tim,
I could help by explaining method 3.2.2.4.5.
Enrico
Von: Public [mailto:public-boun...@cabforum.org] Im Auftrag von Tim Hollebeek
via Public
Gesendet: Dienstag, 6. Februar 2018 17:45
An: CA/Browser Forum Public Discussion List
Betreff: [cabfpub] Seeking Volunteers!
I'm looking for 11
D-TRUST votes Yes on ballot 2018, version 2
As documented in our CP/CPS we currently use both methods in our current
validation practice. The underlying processes are audited by an independent
conformity assessment body (TÜV IT) against the specifications of the BR as
well as the European
Hi all,
D-TRUST fully supports the ongoing discussion on improving BR section 3.2.2.4.1
and 3.2.2.4.5. In our opinion all options on improving the methods need to be
taken into account. Only if there is no way of optimizing the procedure in
order to prohibit potential misissuance scenarios
15 matches
Mail list logo