Re: [motion-path] More natural names for 'auto' and 'reverse'

2015-06-22 Thread Shane Stephens
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 4:20 PM Kari Pihkala kari.pihk...@gmail.com wrote: 2015-06-22 7:27 GMT+03:00 Amelia Bellamy-Royds amelia.bellamy.ro...@gmail.com: Keywords also complicate the animatability of the property. And since this property is all about animation, that should be a

[motion-path] More natural names for 'auto' and 'reverse'

2015-06-21 Thread Shane Stephens
Hi list, Issue 2 of the motion-path specification requests more natural names for ‘auto’ and ‘reverse’. This is in the context of the motion-rotation property: http://dev.w3.org/fxtf/motion-1/#motion-rotation. A specification of ‘motion-rotation: auto’ causes the targeted element to rotate so

Re: [motion-path] More natural names for 'auto' and 'reverse'

2015-06-21 Thread Amelia Bellamy-Royds
My main concern with the keyword `reverse` is that, in the shorthand property, it would be unclear what it applies to. If I was not already familiar, I would assume that it meant travel along the path starting at the end and moving back to the beginning. Auto-reverse isn't much better on that