Chris Bizer wrote:
Hi Kingsley and Paul,
Yes, I completely agree with you that different storage solutions fit
different use cases and that one of the main strengths of the RDF data model
is its flexibility and the possibility to mix different schemata.
Nevertheless, it think it is useful to
Hi Jason,
i believe you're persuing exactly the same goal as the Okkam project
(http://okkam.org).
unlike okkam however you have something up alrady at a nice visible,
uncluttered website.
This mail of mine is just so that you know tha tther eis this common
research effort and in fact to say
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, I have not loaded DBPedia yet. I started with WordNet 3.0, which
apparently did not deem IBM as a part of our language (note Mircosoft
and Google do make the cut!). See the (http://openguid.net/roadmap) for
more details on the data loading initiative. Once that is
An EU consortium? Is this going to end like the Lisbon treaty? :)
Thanks for the tip, my research did not uncover them. Maybe because the
name is obtuse? While Open GUID isn't a good brand name for a t-shirt,
it's at least evocative of it's singular purpose.
I will reach out to them.
I started a discussion on this topic
(http://groups.google.com/group/open-guid-discussion/browse_thread/thread/0bbc190aa80287d8)
to avoid polluting this list with the sordid details. The goal is to
maximize linkage and minimize duplication and pollution with obtuse
inferencing concepts.
Jason
An EU consortium? Is this going to end like the Lisbon treaty? :)
Easy target, but beware of not being too sarcastic here about European
projects. :-)
First because there are a lot of European people around this space, and
moreover a lot of Semantic Web related projects have been
