[[Apologies for cross-posting]]
=
First International Workshop on Semantic Statistics (SemStats 2013)
Full-Day Workshop in conjunction with ISWC 2013, the 12th International
Semantic Web Conference
21-25 October 2013,
+1
:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:
Paul K. Courtney, MS
Applications Specialist/Biomedical Informaticist
Information Systems
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
T: 617.582.7389
C: 603.727.8171
F: 617.632.4030
On 6/19/13 8:44 AM, Bernard Vatant
---
CALL FOR PAPERS
9th International Workshop on
Uncertainty Reasoning for the Semantic Web
http://c4i.gmu.edu/ursw/2013
In conjunction with the
12th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC'13)
Sydney, Australia
October 21-22, 2013
On Thu, 20 Jun 2013 01:28:54 +, エリクソン トーレ t-eriks...@so.taisho.co.jp said:
ex:distance ex:earth ex:moon 381550 25150 u:km.
(Ab)using RDF I was able to (barely) document my semantics
directly in turtle. Where is the semantics and syntax of your
example described? Your
On 19/06/2013 15:19, Dominic Oldman wrote:
When Hugh talks about sharing a particular view I also think about the
need to share particular objectives, and a particular vision, and
match this with a practical way forward. When Hugh talks about
widening of issues I think about how we are ever
On 6/19/13 6:44 PM, Damian Steer wrote:
On 19 Jun 2013, at 23:25, Kingsley Idehen kide...@openlinksw.com wrote:
To be more precise,
Uh-huh.
relative to basic Linked Data, inference and reasoning are distinguishing
RDF features.
s/RDF/Semantic web/ and you might well be right.
If not,
On 6/19/13 9:03 PM, エリクソン トーレ wrote:
差出人: Kingsley Idehen [mailto:kide...@openlinksw.com]
送信日時: 2013年6月20日 6:37
On 6/19/13 3:41 PM, David Booth wrote:
On 06/19/2013 02:29 AM, エリクソン トーレ wrote:
My point was that even if the data producer doesn't know anything about
RDF, when applying the meme he
On 6/19/13 10:47 PM, Young,Jeff (OR) wrote:
My impression is that Kingsley is arguing that triples is triples. Concrete
syntax is irrelevant, even if those triples are barely recognizable by naive
agents. If that's what he's saying, I would agree. Converting barely
recognizable triples into a
Apologies for multiple postings.
===
BioASQ Workshop
Website: http://www.bioasq.org/news/bioasq-workshop
Project URL: http://www.bioasq.org/
Post-conference workshop after CLEF 2013, September 27, Valencia, Spain
To be honest, this entire thread has reminded me of the lengthy threads on the
ontolog listserv that finally caused me to unsubscribe. I could not
characterize those threads as discussions because so many of the participants
were actually talking past each other and were making assertions based
On 20 June 2013 15:37, Courtney, Paul K. paul_court...@dfci.harvard.eduwrote:
To be honest, this entire thread has reminded me of the lengthy threads
on the ontolog listserv that finally caused me to unsubscribe. I could not
characterize those threads as discussions because so many of the
On 6/20/13 9:37 AM, Courtney, Paul K. wrote:
Seems the same was happening here. I gather that Kingsley was
attempting to ensure that we don’t forget that the roots of RDF and
triples goes way back to early work on E-R diagrams.
Yes.
My fundamental point is that RDF has generated bad-will
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 5:02 PM, Melvin Carvalho
melvincarva...@gmail.comwrote:
Restate/reflect ideas that in other posts that are troubling/puzzling and
ask for confirmation or clarification.
I am simply confused with the idea brought forward by Kingsley that RDF is
*not* part of the
On 6/20/13 11:45 AM, Luca Matteis wrote:
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 5:02 PM, Melvin Carvalho
melvincarva...@gmail.com mailto:melvincarva...@gmail.com wrote:
# Restate/reflect ideas that in other posts that are
troubling/puzzling and ask for confirmation or clarification.
I am simply
Kingsley, nothing you just said in reply to my statement has to do with the
*definition* of Linked Data, which is what I was discussing.
It's not really productive to quote people's statements, and answer with
something entirely unrelated.
I understand what RDF is and what it allows you to do
Hi,
I agree with Luca's viewpoint. The W3C standard RDF model (a.k.a triple
model) is one of most fundamental piece of the technology stack defining
Linked Data (along with URIs and HTTP). I think it is important to make
understand the community that Linked Data can be serialized into different
My 2c is .. i agree with kingsley diagram , linked data should be possible
without RDF (no matter serialization) :)
however this is different from previous definitions
i think its a step forward.. but it is different from previously. Do we
want to call it Linked Data 2.0? under this definition
On Jun 20, 2013, at 11:54 AM, Giovanni Tummarello wrote:
My 2c is .. i agree with kingsley diagram , linked data should be possible
without RDF (no matter serialization) :)
however this is different from previous definitions
i think its a step forward.. but it is different from
Not implying that, i'd hope RDF can represent all really but RDF would not
be needed for linked data while an RDF description even alone lonely on the
web could be called Linked Data (if it uses URIs)
GIo
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 7:05 PM, Pat Hayes pha...@ihmc.us wrote:
On Jun 20, 2013, at
On 6/20/13 12:50 PM, Stephane Fellah wrote:
Hi,
I agree with Luca's viewpoint. The W3C standard RDF model (a.k.a
triple model) is one of most fundamental piece of the technology stack
defining Linked Data (along with URIs and HTTP).
I am not disputing that point.
Here's what in dispute,
On 6/20/13 12:54 PM, Giovanni Tummarello wrote:
My 2c is .. i agree with kingsley diagram , linked data should be
possible without RDF (no matter serialization) :)
however this is different from previous definitions
i think its a step forward.. but it is different from previously. Do
we want
On 6/20/13 12:49 PM, Luca Matteis wrote:
Kingsley, nothing you just said in reply to my statement has to do
with the *definition* of Linked Data, which is what I was discussing.
It's not really productive to quote people's statements, and answer
with something entirely unrelated.
I
Kingsley, long story short, what you mean when you say linked data is not
exactly what most other people mean when they say those words. Your
understanding of what they mean is much wider and more all-encompassing than
the common meaning. Personally, I see what you are getting at and (I think)
On Jun 20, 2013, at 11:45 AM, Luca Matteis wrote:
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 5:02 PM, Melvin Carvalho melvincarva...@gmail.com
wrote:
• Restate/reflect ideas that in other posts that are
troubling/puzzling and ask for confirmation or clarification.
I am simply confused with the idea
(apologies for cross-posting)
All,
The Semantic Search research group at Yahoo! Labs is pleased to announce
the open-source code release and public demo of Glimmer, a search engine
for RDF data.
Glimmer, the search engine [1] provides support for offline distributed
indexing of RDF data using
On 6/20/13 1:05 PM, Pat Hayes wrote:
On Jun 20, 2013, at 11:54 AM, Giovanni Tummarello wrote:
My 2c is .. i agree with kingsley diagram , linked data should be possible
without RDF (no matter serialization) :)
however this is different from previous definitions
i think its a step forward..
Kingsley,
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Kingsley Idehen kide...@openlinksw.comwrote:
On 6/20/13 12:50 PM, Stephane Fellah wrote:
Hi,
I agree with Luca's viewpoint. The W3C standard RDF model (a.k.a triple
model) is one of most fundamental piece of the technology stack defining
On 06/20/2013 12:54 PM, Giovanni Tummarello wrote:
My 2c is .. i agree with kingsley diagram , linked data should be
possible without RDF (no matter serialization) :)
however this is different from previous definitions
Remember: if the data is not standards-based interpretable as RDF
(though
On 06/20/2013 12:50 PM, Stephane Fellah wrote:
Hi,
I agree with Luca's viewpoint. The W3C standard RDF model (a.k.a triple
model) is one of most fundamental piece of the technology stack defining
Linked Data (along with URIs and HTTP). I think it is important to make
understand the community
On 6/20/13 1:46 PM, Pat Hayes wrote:
Kingsley, long story short, what you mean when you say linked data is not
exactly what most other people mean when they say those words. Your understanding of what
they mean is much wider and more all-encompassing than the common meaning. Personally, I
see
On Thu, 2013-06-20 at 14:09 -0400, Ted Thibodeau Jr wrote:
On Jun 20, 2013, at 11:45 AM, Luca Matteis wrote:
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 5:02 PM, Melvin Carvalho melvincarva...@gmail.com
wrote:
• Restate/reflect ideas that in other posts that are
troubling/puzzling and ask for
On 20 June 2013 19:46, Pat Hayes pha...@ihmc.us wrote:
Kingsley, long story short, what you mean when you say linked data is
not exactly what most other people mean when they say those words. Your
understanding of what they mean is much wider and more all-encompassing
than the common meaning.
Apologies for cross-postings.
***
**
Call For Papers
6th International Workshop on Semantic Sensor Networks
in conjunction with the 12th International
On 06/20/2013 04:46 PM, Melvin Carvalho wrote:
It's taken 5 years+ to simplify things down to the
Linked Data meme (The semantic web done right) and is starting to gain
some traction.
[ . . . ]
The beauty of of LD is that it's simple and can be understood by a wide
range or people (especially
When we define data in terms of source, intellectual properties attached, usage
licenses and some additional we may be able to define isomorphic or homomorphic
definitions similar to Linked Data with RDF as key instrument.
Increasingly data is ported over mobile and wireless networks which
35 matches
Mail list logo
