Damian Steer wrote:
On 12 Dec 2009, at 21:42, Jeni Tennison wrote:
Hi,
As part of the linked data work the UK government is doing, we're looking at
how to use the linked data that we have as the basis of APIs that are
readily usable by developers who really don't want to learn about RDF
Frederick,
Thanks, that looks interesting, and the idea of supporting similar
mappings to XML and to CSV is very attractive.
But I couldn't actually work out how I would use it in the kind of
situation we find ourselves in. We have, for example, RDF like this:
Hi Jeni,
Jeni Tennison wrote:
As part of the linked data work the UK government is doing, we're
looking at how to use the linked data that we have as the basis of APIs
that are readily usable by developers who really don't want to learn
about RDF or SPARQL.
Wow! Talk about timing. We are
Hi,
Dave (Reynolds) raised the point that lists are an integral part of
most APIs. This is another thing that we know we need to address in
the UK linked government data project, but are unsure as yet how best
to do so.
This is a bit of a brain dump of my current thinking, which is
Hi Jeni,
On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 9:42 PM, Jeni Tennison j...@jenitennison.com wrote:
Hi,
As part of the linked data work the UK government is doing, we're looking at
how to use the linked data that we have as the basis of APIs that are
readily usable by developers who really don't want to
On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 8:03 PM, Dave Reynolds
dave.e.reyno...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi Jeni,
[Rest of post snipped for now, I'll respond properly later. Seems like we
are on sufficiently similar wavelengths that it is just a matter of
working the details.]
I don't know where the best place
On Sat, 2009-12-12 at 21:42 +, Jeni Tennison wrote:
To put this in context, what I think we should aim for is a pure
publishing format that is optimised for approachability for normal
developers, *not* an interchange format. RDF/JSON [1] and the SPARQL
results JSON format [2] aren't
The first question is: How do we define which resources are members of a
list?
Perhaps a dead simple way to do it is
http://sw.deri.org/2007/07/sitemapextension/ - you lose some of the semantic
expressiveness, but you list resources.
Dan is right on many front... (it usually true:-)
- I personally do not see a problem this being done on ESW, this does not mean
any type
of formal 'Association' with W3C (giving you a writing right is a matter of
setting up a
user for you and sending, eg, me or dan a mail to add you to the
