On Fri, 4 Jun 2010 18:06:08 -0500
Peter DeVries pete.devr...@gmail.com wrote:
I would appreciate feedback on these models and any suggestions for
how they could be improved. :-)
The following:
@prefix txn: http://lod.taxonconcept.org/ontology/txn.owl# .
There is also a community-supported ontology for taxonomy called Darwin Core
at:
http://rs.tdwg.org/dwc/terms/#kingdom
On Fri, 4 Jun 2010 18:06:08 -0500
Peter DeVries pete.devr...@gmail.com wrote:
I would appreciate feedback on these models and any suggestions for
how they could be
Hi Toby,
I have what I call a lightweight phylogeny that should match up with the
fields for the DarwinCore.
However, these are more for user convenience, since I don't believe that a
species concepts should be modeled as having a fixed phylogeny.
A phylogeny is an hypothesis which changes over
** Apologies if you receive multiple copies of this CFP. **
Dear Colleagues:
Please disseminate this message in your networks / subscribed lists.
We also invite you to
All,
My brains breaking over this one - can see it and can't quite flesh out
the details (or figure out if it's worth it) - it's very much a marmite
(love/hate) idea that I haven't fully formed, and is targeted at
addressing some common problems with namedgraph, reification, provenance
On 6 Jun 2010, at 17:17, Nathan wrote:
1: Introduce a 'value' property
I have good news :-) rdf:value [1]
Damian
[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-mt/#rdfValue
Damian Steer wrote:
On 6 Jun 2010, at 17:17, Nathan wrote:
1: Introduce a 'value' property
I have good news :-) rdf:value [1]
Brilliant, I hoped that's what it was for (but lack of documentation led
me astray!)
Great,
Nathan
On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 6:17 PM, Nathan nat...@webr3.org wrote:
...
:me foaf:name [
ex:value 'nathan' ;
ex:type xsd:string ;
ex:language 'en-gb' .
] .
foaf:name has range rdfs:Literal, this still allows us to say:
:me foaf:name [
And do some funkier stuff:
:me
ops, accidentally sent too eraly
On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 6:17 PM, Nathan nat...@webr3.org wrote:
...
:me foaf:name [
ex:value 'nathan' ;
ex:type xsd:string ;
ex:language 'en-gb' .
] .
foaf:name has range rdfs:Literal, this still allows us to say:
:me foaf:name [
ex:sha_1
Toby Inkster wrote:
On Fri, 4 Jun 2010 18:06:08 -0500
Peter DeVries pete.devr...@gmail.com wrote:
I would appreciate feedback on these models and any suggestions for
how they could be improved. :-)
The following:
@prefix txn: http://lod.taxonconcept.org/ontology/txn.owl# .
Reto Bachmann-Gmuer wrote:
ops, accidentally sent too eraly
On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 6:17 PM, Nathan nat...@webr3.org wrote:
...
:me foaf:name [
ex:value 'nathan' ;
ex:type xsd:string ;
ex:language 'en-gb' .
] .
foaf:name has range rdfs:Literal, this still allows us to say:
:me
On 6 Jun 2010, at 19:54, Reto Bachmann-Gmuer wrote:
your way of specifying the type of the literal reminds me the recent
discussion started by Henry Story:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/semantic-web/2010Feb/0174.html
following this we could also say:
:me foaf:name [
On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 9:44 PM, Nathan nat...@webr3.org wrote:
so are we saying that all of these express the same:
:me foaf:name 'nathan'^^xsd:string .
:me foaf:name [
owl:sameAs 'nathan'^^xsd:string .
] .
this two mean the same
:me foaf:name [
xsd:string 'nathan' .
] .
this should
Reto Bachmann-Gmuer wrote:
On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 9:44 PM, Nathan nat...@webr3.org wrote:
so are we saying that all of these express the same:
:me foaf:name 'nathan'^^xsd:string .
:me foaf:name [
rdf:value 'nathan'^^xsd:string .
] .
I find it hard to communicate using a term that has no
On 6 Jun 2010, at 22:22, Nathan wrote:
Anything stopping me creating an ex:value which does have a strong meaning
and definition where in usage both of the following express the same:
:me foaf:name 'nathan'^^xsd:string .
:me foaf:name [ ex:value 'nathan'^^xsd:string ] .
seems to me
Hi!
Just a few notes concerning your ideas and OWL DL (I don't know whether this
is important for you or not, but some people might find it relevant):
Nathan wrote:
1: Introduce a 'value' property
Where currently we can say:
:me foaf:name 'nathan' .
I'd propose introducing an ex:value
Hi Toby,
Here is where we seem to have some differences.
txn:species plexippus ;
txn:authority Linnaeus, 1758 ;
txn:epithet plexippus ;
txn:author_year (Linnaeus, 1758) ;
I looked at the latest DarwinCore
http://code.google.com/p/darwincore/wiki/Taxon
Since it
Thanks to everyone for the good feedback and comments.
I've made some small changes to the ontology based on all the feedback.
These are largely small bug fixes and (hopefully) improvements in
documentation.
The significant changes include:
* addition of a transitive version of
Dear Soren,
I took a quick look at the EUNIS database. Considering this year is the
International Year of Biodiversity can you tell me if similar projects exist
for other geographical regions or any projects of a global nature?
Milton Ponson
GSM: +297 747 8280
Rainbow Warriors Core Foundation
19 matches
Mail list logo
