On Thu, 2010-10-07 at 01:38 +0200, Sören Auer wrote:
On 07.10.2010 1:13, Georgi Kobilarov wrote:
So, now the EU also takes that burden off the small linked data
consultancies and businesses.
Not at all! PUBLINK is not aimed at organizations which already
precisely know what they want
On 07.10.2010 9:57, Dave Reynolds wrote:
Insofar PUBLINK rather clears the way for commercial linked data service
providers.
But is not working with any breadth of such providers.
I share Georgi's reservations, seems like an odd direction for EU
framework projects to take.
Its not really a
Clearly this is an exciting thing to be doing, but I couldn't let Sören's
comments go :-)
On 07/10/2010 08:57, Dave Reynolds dave.e.reyno...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, 2010-10-07 at 01:38 +0200, Sören Auer wrote:
On 07.10.2010 1:13, Georgi Kobilarov wrote:
So, now the EU also takes that burden
Sören Auer wrote:
PS: Please also keep in mind that PUBLINK is very limited (max. 3-5 data
owning organizations) and ca. 10 man days of support for each.
I think those numbers are the really important bits. I have seen EU projects
where there were plans to perform really huge field studies. I
On 07/10/2010 11:58, Hugh Glaser h...@ecs.soton.ac.uk wrote:
Clearly this is an exciting thing to be doing, but I couldn't let Sören's
comments go :-)
On 07/10/2010 08:57, Dave Reynolds dave.e.reyno...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, 2010-10-07 at 01:38 +0200, Sören Auer wrote:
On 07.10.2010
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 1:00 PM, Michael Schneider schn...@fzi.de wrote:
Sören Auer wrote:
PS: Please also keep in mind that PUBLINK is very limited (max. 3-5 data
owning organizations) and ca. 10 man days of support for each.
I think those numbers are the really important bits. I have seen EU
Hi all,
Please find below a Call for Chapters for a new contributed book to be entitled
Linking_Government_Data. Please distribute this information as widely as
possible to help us collect useful success stories, techniques and benefits to
using Linked Data in governments. Thanks in advance.
So, now the EU also takes that burden off the small linked data
consultancies and businesses.
Not at all! PUBLINK is not aimed at organizations which already precisely
know what they want and are willing to pay for it.
Oh yes, clients who precisely know what they want.
Of course, how
Hi Michael,
Insofar PUBLINK rather clears the way for commercial linked data
service providers.
By doing what? Which bits does publink do and which bits are left to the
commercial sector?
From the lines above it aims to help people in organizations who want to
persuade their decision
Sören,
before you get too depressed with all this negativity . I'd just
like to say that I for one think that this is a *great* idea and a
very good use of EU project resources. Getting out there and helping
to kick start more institutions to LoD is definitely the way to go
with your
Hi Martin,
We have discussed this off-list before, but maybe others would like to
chime in...
I don't think it is sad; because using invisible div / span elements nicely
decouple the organization of the visual content from the embedded data.
Martin, you never fail to hash-mark your
[apologies for cross-posting]
W3C Library Linked Data Incubator Group - http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/
Call for Use Cases: Library Linked Data
Are you currently using linked data technology [1] for library-related data, or
considering doing it in the near future? If so, please tell us
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 1:49 PM, Martin Hepp martin.h...@ebusiness-unibw.org
wrote:
It is too expensive to expect data owners to lift their existing data to
academic expectations. You must empower them to preserve as much data
semantics and data structure as they can provide ad hoc. Lifting
On 10/7/10 10:02 AM, David Wood wrote:
Hi all,
Please find below a Call for Chapters for a new contributed book to be entitled
Linking_Government_Data. Please distribute this information as widely as
possible to help us collect useful success stories, techniques and benefits to
using
Will all due respect, as with any monograph this is a call to
*contribute*; the benefits if accepted are being part of an important
work. Recipients are free to not submit!
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 11:23 AM, Kingsley Idehen kide...@openlinksw.com wrote:
On 10/7/10 10:02 AM, David Wood wrote:
Hi
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 5:09 PM, Martin Hepp martin.h...@ebusiness-unibw.org
wrote:
I've got mixed feelings about snippets vs fully embeded RDFa. For
the most part I think systems that use snippets will be more maintainable,
but I've seen cases where fully embedded RDFa fits very well into a
On 10/7/10 11:42 AM, John Erickson wrote:
Will all due respect, as with any monograph this is a call to
*contribute*; the benefits if accepted are being part of an important
work. Recipients are free to not submit!
John,
My question still stands? Who benefits from the sale of the book? No
On 10/7/10 11:14 AM, Paul Houle wrote:
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 1:49 PM, Martin Hepp
martin.h...@ebusiness-unibw.org
mailto:martin.h...@ebusiness-unibw.org wrote:
It is too expensive to expect data owners to lift their existing
data to academic expectations. You must empower them to
Il 07/10/2010 18:27, Kingsley Idehen ha scritto:
For instance, you could clearly see
http://ookaboo.com/o/pictures/topic/28999/Beijing
as a signifier for a city. Some people would make the assertion that
dbpedia:Beijing owl:sameAs ookaboo:topic/28999/Beijing.
and that's not entirely stupid.
These things that bug you do so with good reason. I often call it semantic
infidelity. For an in depth discussion of a closely related issue see:
Overloading
OWL
sameAshttp://ontologydesignpatterns.org/wiki/Community:Overloading_OWL_sameAsA
summary is given below.
Michael
*Issue: *owl:sameAs
Hello All,
I have a question about SPARQL 1.1 queries.
If have the following triples:
:LeagueA abc:hasMembers :Alice,
:Bob,
:Carol .
:LeagueB abc:hasMembers :Dante,
:Edward.
If I want the following table of results:
?league ?membercount
LeagueA 3
LeagueB 2
On 10/7/10 12:51 PM, Roberto Mirizzi wrote:
Il 07/10/2010 18:27, Kingsley Idehen ha scritto:
For instance, you could clearly see
http://ookaboo.com/o/pictures/topic/28999/Beijing
as a signifier for a city. Some people would make the assertion that
dbpedia:Beijing owl:sameAs
Il 07/10/2010 19:37, Kingsley Idehen ha scritto:
We recently discussed about similar issues, anyway it's still quite
obsure for me why this:
dbpedia:Beijing owl:sameAs ookaboo:topic/28999/Beijing .
Where did that come from? Did you make that claim or did something else?
We discussed
Hi Kingsley,
I hope the following context answers your question since I'm familiar with the
details ...
In the spirit of transparency, we are looking for ways to raise the profile of
successful projects in order to increase credibility of the SemWeb/LD
community. A book like this doesn't
On 10/7/10 1:50 PM, Roberto Mirizzi wrote:
Il 07/10/2010 19:37, Kingsley Idehen ha scritto:
We recently discussed about similar issues, anyway it's still quite
obsure for me why this:
dbpedia:Beijing owl:sameAs ookaboo:topic/28999/Beijing .
Where did that come from? Did you make that
On 10/7/10 1:53 PM, Bernadette Hyland wrote:
Hi Kingsley,
I hope the following context answers your question since I'm familiar
with the details ...
Bernadette,
In the spirit of transparency, we are looking for ways to raise the
profile of successful projects in order to increase
Hi Paul:
On 07.10.2010, at 17:56, Paul Houle wrote:
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 5:09 PM, Martin Hepp martin.h...@ebusiness-unibw.org
wrote:
I've got mixed feelings about snippets vs fully embeded
RDFa. For the most part I think systems that use snippets will be
more maintainable, but
On 07.10.2010, at 17:14, Paul Houle wrote:
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 1:49 PM, Martin Hepp martin.h...@ebusiness-unibw.org
wrote:
From a commercial viewpoint, imperfect data is an
opportunity. If I didn't have other projects ahead of it in the
queue, I'd seriously be thinking
Hi Tom,
taking our thread to the public is definitely good.
My point is that, yes, it is tempting to tweak your invisible data to
polish your ranking.
Example: In HTML, you say the price is 100 USD, in RDFa you say it was
50 USD.
However, it is - from a computational perspective - very,
Hi LOD'ers,
There was some discussion about ways to record species observations using
the geo vocabulary at a recent biodiversity informatics meeting.
Some see the advantages of using the geo standard, but we really need to
have a way to incorporate and error or extent in meters.
What would be
Hi Peter
Something like the example below, but I suspect that this might not make it
a real geo:Point?
barely. The old maths teacher in me frowns at points having a radius :)
geo:Point
geo:lat55.701/geo:lat
geo:long12.552/geo:long
dwc:radius10/dwc:radius
/geo:Point
Dear all:
After thorough testing, we have just deployed a service update of the
GoodRelations vocabulary at
http://purl.org/goodrelations/v1
It is 99.99% backwards compatible with all existing data and
applications.
Please refresh your cashes!
Thanks Bernard,
I will try that! :-)
- Pete
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 4:54 PM, Bernard Vatant
bernard.vat...@mondeca.comwrote:
Hi Peter
Something like the example below, but I suspect that this might not make it
a real geo:Point?
barely. The old maths teacher in me frowns at points having
33 matches
Mail list logo
