Great to see it happening.
And here is the first feature request: Can you please enable a default
out-stream in the Universal RDF Encoder for /dev/null (including its own
source).
Thank you and good luck!
Cheers,
Michael-being-April-fooled-just-a-minute-before-logging-off ;)
I second Yves. Let's all come together at #swig channel with a bunch of bright
people, nice discussions, and smart bots around ;)
Cheers,
Michael
--
Michael Hausenblas, MSc.
Institute of Information Systems Information Management
Hi,
I know it's a bit early to ask, but in case you're already planning to
attend the European Semantic Web Conference (ESWC08), 01-05 June 2008,
Tenerife (Spain) I'd like to ask you to flag your availability for a LOD
gathering at [1].
Cheers,
Michael
[1]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2008 5:20 PM
To: Hausenblas, Michael
Cc: public-lod@w3.org
Subject: Re: Using Linking Open Data datasets
Hi Michael,
Hausenblas, Michael wrote:
Dear LODers,
One thing we encounter recurrently when using the LOD
datasets is where
to 'start best
/
--
-Original Message-
From: Tom Heath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2008 5:48 PM
To: Hausenblas, Michael; public-lod@w3.org
Subject: RE: Using Linking Open Data datasets
Hi Michael,
I think there's definitely much scope for improvements
To: Hausenblas, Michael
Cc: public-lod@w3.org
Subject: Re: Using Linking Open Data datasets
Hello Michael,
Hausenblas, Michael wrote:
Dear LODers,
One thing we encounter recurrently when using the LOD datasets is
where
to 'start best'. I'm unsure how to handle this situation, so I tried
to
gather some
Tom, Chris,
Thanks for the great event - it was a pleasure to see more than 30 people in
that room discussing LOD stuff ;)
Please note that
http://esw.w3.org/topic/SweoIG/TaskForces/CommunityProjects/LinkingOpenData/TenerifeGathering
has been updated to reflect the lightning talks. So, in
Ed,
Congrats! Very, very impressive usage of both linked data and RDFa ;)
Especially your 'GRDDL stuff' in the header should be used in 'good
practice' somewhere on SWD or LOD I think.
Cheers,
Michael
--
Michael Hausenblas,
Richard,
(I'm ignoring the availability of RDFa in my argument --
unfortunately there is no way for a client to indicate that it supports
RDFa AFAIK,
so it cannot really be factored into the content negotiation equation.)
As you may guess I have a comment regarding this one ;)
I'm note
/
--
-Original Message-
From: Jun Zhao [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 1:21 PM
To: Hausenblas, Michael
Cc: Raimond, Yves; public-lod@w3.org
Subject: Re: [call for comments] voiD - vocabulary of
interlinked datasets
Hi Michael,
I think Yves' proposal kind of hits our
RESEARCH Forschungsgesellschaft mbH
http://www.joanneum.at/iis/
--
-Original Message-
From: Keith Alexander [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 2:07 PM
To: Olaf Hartig; Hausenblas, Michael; public-lod@w3.org
Ivan,
which of the two you generate. In case you use turtle, then it
might be better to use text/turtle as a media type (per
http://www.w3.org/TeamSubmission/2008/SUBM-turtle-20080114/)
Do you know if the TAG has already agreed on this issue [1]? Is the team
submission in sync with it?
11, 2008 3:58 PM
To: Hausenblas, Michael
Cc: Keith Alexander; public-lod@w3.org
Subject: Re: [call for comments] voiD - vocabulary of
interlinked datasets
Hello,
On Wednesday 11 June 2008 14:40:12 Hausenblas, Michael wrote:
[...]
provenance is indeed in scope (as it says it on the Wiki
Of Giovanni Tummarello
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2008 12:08 AM
To: Hausenblas, Michael
Cc: public-lod@w3.org; Semantic Web
Subject: The king is dressed in void
Wasnt RDF all aabout being self describing?
if i say giovanni works in research .. do i really need a
vucabolary that says this rdf contains
Dear LODers,
As there are some discussions about what is the 'vocabulary of
interlinked datasets'(voiD) actually good for I thought I give it a try
and put an example online [1]. After all, please note that we have NOT
yet started to define the vocabulary; all you see is the strawman
proposal
Dear LODers,
I'd like to ask for comments regarding a topic which IMHO has so far not
been heavily addressed by our community: (fine-grained) interlinking of
multimedia data. At [1] I've put together some initial thoughts. Please
consider sharing your view and reply to this mail and/or add to
: Peter Krantz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2008 3:29 PM
To: Hausenblas, Michael
Cc: public-lod@w3.org; Semantic Web
Subject: Re: Where is the INTERLINKED multimedia data?
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 1:47 PM, Hausenblas, Michael
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear LODers,
I'd like
/
--
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Bob Wyman
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2008 4:50 PM
To: Hausenblas, Michael
Cc: public-lod@w3.org; Semantic Web
Subject: Re: Where
PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2008 3:38 AM
To: Hausenblas, Michael
Cc: public-lod@w3.org; Semantic Web
Subject: Re: Where is the INTERLINKED multimedia data?
When the empire of SGML/DSSSL/HyTime splintered into fiefdoms of
XMLishness, the domain of synchronized multimedia fell to SMIL
(http
[Note: changed LOD mailing list to the new one; the MIT-list is not used
anymore]
Aldo,
+1 to more or less everything you say.
1) I think Mr Cyganiak's diagram could use some numbers ( how many
records are there in this giant database? )
This is actually one of the driving force behind voiD
e.g. http://dbpedia.org/resource/Madonna_(entertainer) is not a valid DBpedia
resource URI. the correct one is
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Madonna_%28entertainer%29
Hm. Could you clearify this please?
curl -I http://dbpedia.org/page/Madonna_(entertainer)
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Server:
/
--
-Original Message-
From: Georgi Kobilarov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 01, 2008 2:42 PM
To: Hausenblas, Michael
Cc: Mariano Consens; Chris Bizer; Oktie Hassanzadeh; public-lod@w3.org
Subject: RE: Linked Movie DataBase
Hi Michael,
e.g. http
]
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2008 12:22 PM
To: Hausenblas, Michael
Cc: semantic-web at W3C
Subject: Re: GoodRelations - The Web Ontology for E-Commerce
Hi Michael:
Thanks! As for relating it to [1]: As for as I understand that work
Kingsley,
Linkage to other Linked Data spaces (instances and classes) is a
desired added bonus, but not the essential definition (imho) :-)
I tend to disagree. Not only a bonus, IMHO, a necessity when thinking of
RDF-island vs. the (RDF) Web of Data, with Web being emphasised ;)
Cheers,
Thanks to many people joining in (rumors say over 50) - now is time for
wrapping-up.
Please visit the LOD Gathering Wiki page [1], add your name if you have been
around, yesterday. Additionally, in case you gave a lightning talk, please put
a short description there, as well. I've started to
Kingsley,
Grounding in 404 and 30x makes sense to me. However I am still in the
conception phase ;)
Sent from my iPhone
On 12 Feb 2009, at 14:02, Kingsley Idehen kide...@openlinksw.com
wrote:
Michael Hausenblas wrote:
Bernhard, All,
So, another take on how to deal with broken links:
that this is trying to solve a similar problem to
that which
our deprecated URIs is doing in our CRS.
On 14/02/2009 14:06, Hausenblas, Michael michael.hausenb...@deri.org
wrote:
Kingsley,
Grounding in 404 and 30x makes sense to me. However I am still in the
conception phase ;)
Sent from my
On 16 Jun 2011, at 22:11, Harry Halpin hhal...@ibiblio.org wrote:
I've been watching the community response to schema.org for the last
bit of time. Overall, I think we should clarify why people are upset.
First, there should be no reason to be upset that the major search
engines went off and
28 matches
Mail list logo
