Re: Vocabulary to describe software projects and their dependencies

On 08/08/2016 14:57, Martynas Jusevičius wrote: DOAP vocabulary comes very close: https://github.com/edumbill/doap Too bad it looks to be unmaintained. Strangely, the schema does not seem to support relationships (dependencies) between projects. Just a thought: would DOAP + PROV fit the

Re: New LOD dataset for media types

Hi Silvio, Nice work: this could be handy. I have a couple of questions/comments: 1. I assume the machine formats are accessible by content negotiation? It might be handy to also include direct links on the web page. For example, I found I could change the .html suffix to .ttl or .json to

Re: New LOD dataset for media types

On 05/11/2015 16:35, Silvio Peroni wrote: >Perhaps establish something likehttps://w3id.org/sparontologies/mediatype/ and redirect for your server. I believe you could have stronger adoption and use of your ontology if you adopt a good IRI

Re: Microsoft Access for RDF?

Hi Kingsley, In https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-lod/2015Feb/0116.html You said, re Annalist: My enhancement requests would be that you consider supporting of at least one of the following, in regards to storage I/O: 1. LDP 2. WebDAV 3. SPARQL Graph Protocol 4. SPARQL 1.1 Insert,

Re: Microsoft Access for RDF?

Hi Stian, Thanks for the mention :) Graham Klyne's Annalist is perhaps not quite what you are thinking of (I don't think it can connect to an arbitrary SPARQL endpoint), but I would consider it as falling under a similar category, as you have a user interface to define record types and forms,

Re: New Hewlett Packard patent may be a barrier to Semantic Web services adoption

I don't have a legal department to challenge the patent, but in case it helps: http://www.ninebynine.org/SWAD-E/Scenario-HomeNetwork/HomeNetworkConfig.html This was work I did around 2002-03, and includes use of RDF technologies to set access controls on a Cisco IOS router, which appears to

Re: Subjects as Literals, [was Re: The Ordered List Ontology]

[cc's trimmed] I'm with Jeremy here, the problem's economic not technical. If we could introduce subjects-as-literals in a way that: (a) doesn't invalidate any existing RDF, and (b) doesn't permit the generation of RDF/XML that existing applications cannot parse, then I think there's a

Re: The Ordered List Ontology

Bob, A desired feature that led to the current rdf:List structure is the ability to close a list - so some separate sub-graph can't silently add properties not in the original. Your pattern might allow this through additon of a maxSlotIndex property on olo:OrderedList (not suggesting this as

Re: how to consume linked data

Dan Brickley wrote: This doc-typing idiom never got heavily used in FOAF, beyond the type PersonalProfileDocument, which FOAF defines. Mostly we just linked FOAF files together (initially with seeAlso and IFPs, lately using URIs more explicitly). I think there are many other reasons why