Hello,
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 3:13 PM, Thomas Steiner to...@google.com wrote:
Dear Public-LOD,
As different Web browsers support different video codecs, with Web
video it is not uncommon to see things like the below (simplified for
legibility reasons)…
video
source src=./video.ogv
Hello,
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 9:16 PM, Kuno Woudt k...@frob.nl wrote:
Hello,
On 09/05/2013 02:37 PM, Barry Norton wrote:
By the way, the easiest way to work with the server is to use the VM but
this hadn't been updated since last year. I have an up-to-date version
for the Summer School
Hello,
Musicbrainz is a large music database and currently exposes a large
amount of data as RDFa, accounting for quite a big (and useful) part
of the Linked Data cloud. However they're lacking someone to maintain
it going forward, to adapt it to previous and upcoming schema changes:
sad) to
lose the RDFa and re-examine the decision whether separate RDF-resolvable
resources could be provided at MB.org or elsewhere.
Barry
[1] github.com/LinkedBrainz/MusicBrainz-R2RML
On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 8:55 AM, Yves Raimond yves.raim...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello,
Musicbrainz
, Oxford e-Research Centre, UK
Mark Sandler, Queen Mary, University of London, UK
Yves Raimond, BBC RD, UK
Programme committee
Sebastian Ewert, Queen Mary, University of London, UK
George Fazekas, Queen Mary, University of London, UK
Sean Bechhofer, University
for time-based navigation e.g. musical and
narrative structures
Organising committee
---
David de Roure, Oxford e-Research Centre, UK
Mark Sandler, Queen Mary, University of London, UK
Yves Raimond, BBC RD, UK
Programme committee
Sebastian
for time-based navigation e.g. musical and
narrative structures
Organising committee
---
David de Roure, Oxford e-Research Centre, UK
Mark Sandler, Queen Mary, University of London, UK
Yves Raimond, BBC RD, UK
Programme committee
-
Sebastian
for time-based navigation e.g. musical and
narrative structures
Organising committee
* David de Roure, Oxford e-Research Centre, UK
* Mark Sandler, Queen Mary, University of London, UK
* Yves Raimond, BBC RD, UK
In which case we can probably get rid of the ':' too?
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 3:00 PM, Barry Norton barry.nor...@ontotext.com wrote:
That would save a LOT of typing. I haven't used ftp:// in years, maybe we
could just go for : and assume it's HTTP?
Barry
On 01/04/2013 14:57, Hugh Glaser
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 1:05 PM, Bernard Vatant
bernard.vat...@mondeca.com wrote:
Re. availability, just a reminder of SPARQL Endpoints Status service
http://labs.mondeca.com/sparqlEndpointsStatus/index.html
As of today 80% (192/240) endpoints registered at CKAN are up and running.
Monitor
Hello!
The difference between these two scenarios is that there's almost no CPU
involvement in serving the PDF file, but naive RDF sites use lots of cycles
to generate the response to a query for an RDF document.
Right now queries to data.southampton.ac.uk (eg.
Hello!
We're organising a panel discussion on music and the semantic web in
London, on the 13th of May, as part of the 130th AES convention:
http://www.aes.org/events/130/workshops/?ID=2639
Best regards, and hopefully see some of you there!
Yves
Hello!
And if you can make it to London for this workshop, we're organising a
related panel discussion the day after at the Audio Engineering
Society 130th convention in London. I'll send the programme over as
soon as it is available.
Best,
y
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 10:36 AM, Daniel Alexander
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 1:56 PM, Bernard Vatant
bernard.vat...@mondeca.com wrote:
Interesting ... it figures that the authoritative namespace for cc has been
indeed http://creativecommons.org/ns#, for at least two years and certainly
more.
But since there is no mention of the new namespace
Hello!
The Guardian just announced that they added ISBNs and Musicbrainz
GUIDs to their API:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/open-platform/blog/linked-data-open-platform
http://www.guardian.co.uk/open-platform/blog/references-in-api
Nice feature enabling Linked Data apps (BBC Music?) to draw in
Hello!
The list seems to miss all the SWI-Prolog endpoints for some reason,
e.g. http://www.ckan.net/package/jamendo-dbtune
Cheers,
y
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 2:02 PM, Jens Lehmann
lehm...@informatik.uni-leipzig.de wrote:
Hello,
On 01.10.2010 14:08, Richard Cyganiak wrote:
The real news
Hello!
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 7:10 PM, Anja Jentzsch a...@anjeve.de wrote:
Hi all,
we are in the process of drawing the next version of the LOD cloud diagram.
This time it is likely to contain around 180 datasets altogether having a
size of around 20 billion RDF triples.
For drawing the
Hello!
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 5:09 PM, Nicholas Humfrey
nicholas.humf...@bbc.co.uk wrote:
Hello,
I have added external links to dbpedialite, for example see Berlin:
http://dbpedialite.org/things/3354
Is there a better predicate to use than rdfs:seeAlso? I am not sure if it is
correct
Hello!
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 10:02 PM, Nathan nat...@webr3.org wrote:
Pat Hayes wrote:
However, before I lose any more of my SW friends, let me say at once that
I am NOT arguing for this change to RDF.
so after hundreds of emails, I have to ask - what (the hell) defines RDF?
I've read
Hello Ivan!
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 5:50 AM, Ivan Mikhailov
imikhai...@openlinksw.com wrote:
Hello Yves,
It's a virtuoso function surfaced as a predicate.
magic predicate was an initial moniker used at creation time.
bif:contains doesn't exist in pure triple form etc..
Why couldn't it?
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 10:38 AM, Henry Story henry.st...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2 Jul 2010, at 09:39, Ian Davis wrote:
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 4:44 AM, Pat Hayes pha...@ihmc.us wrote:
Jeremy, your argument is perfectly sound from your company's POV, but not
from a broader perspective. Of course,
Hi Richard!
[trimmed cc list]
On 2 Jul 2010, at 11:15, Yves Raimond wrote:
I am not arguing for each vendor to implement that. I am arguing for
removing this arbitrary limitation from the RDF spec. Also marked as
an issue since 2000:
http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms
Hello!
IMHO an emphatic NO.
RDF is about constructing structured descriptions where Subjects have
Identifiers in the form of Name References (which may or many resolve to
Structured Representations of Referents carried or borne by Descriptor
Docs/Resources). An Identifier != Literal.
If
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 5:22 PM, Kingsley Idehen kide...@openlinksw.com wrote:
Henry Story wrote:
On 1 Jul 2010, at 16:35, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
Yves Raimond wrote:
Hello Kingsley!
[snip]
IMHO an emphatic NO.
RDF is about constructing structured descriptions where Subjects have
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 5:45 PM, Henry Story henry.st...@gmail.com wrote:
On 1 Jul 2010, at 18:18, Yves Raimond wrote:
In any case RDF Semantics does, I believe,
allow literals in subject position. It is just that many many syntaxes
don't allow that to be expressed,
It doesn't seem
Hello Jeremy!
One example on the top of my head. You have a 'magic predicate' such as
Virtuoso bif:contains, but slightly more expansive than that (a large index
lookup, a difficult mathematical computation or fuzzy literal search, etc).
If you were able to store the result in RDF once that magic
Or, an even simpler use-case: storing metaphones for strings in a triple
store.
y
On 1 Jul 2010 18:15, Yves Raimond yves.raim...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Jeremy!
One example on the top of my head. You have a 'magic predicate' such as
Virtuoso bif:contains, but slightly more expansive than
Hello!
owl:Class is defined as a subclass of rdfs:Class *in the OWL
specifications*. The RDF/RDFS specification does not say anything about
owl:Class. So, from a pure RDFS perspective, owl:Class has as much meaning
as, e.g., xyz:abc. The fact that someone defines *somewhere* that xyz:abc
Hello!
owl:Class is defined as a subclass of rdfs:Class *in the OWL
specifications*. The RDF/RDFS specification does not say anything about
owl:Class. So, from a pure RDFS perspective, owl:Class has as much
meaning
as, e.g., xyz:abc. The fact that someone defines *somewhere* that
Hello!
We are in the process of rolling out some links to DBpedia over in BBC
Programmes. However, we are facing a small issue. We use our own
categorisation scheme based on SKOS, and then want to add some sameAs
links to DBpedia.
For example, we currently publish the following statements:
Is that an issue? Should we drop SKOS altogether if we go on with
that, or should we use skos:exactMatch instead of owl:sameAs?
see also http://wiki.foaf-project.org/w/term_focus
I'm running out of excuses for not having added this already...
Great, thanks for the link!
However, I'd like
Is that an issue? Should we drop SKOS altogether if we go on with
that, or should we use skos:exactMatch instead of owl:sameAs?
see also http://wiki.foaf-project.org/w/term_focus
I'm running out of excuses for not having added this already...
Great, thanks for the link!
However, I'd like
Hello Hugh!
Did you try EasyRDF?
http://code.google.com/p/easyrdf/
It was coded by Nicholas Humfrey from the BBC and has quite a lot of
cool features whilst being very lightweight - it also handles
cURL-ing/parsing for you.
Cheers,
y
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 6:10 PM, Hugh Glaser
Hello!
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 8:36 PM, Dan Brickley dan...@danbri.org wrote:
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 7:56 PM, Ross Singer rossfsin...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, I have a question about something I've run across when trying to
parse the RDF coming from the BBC. If you take a document like:
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 8:54 PM, Yves Raimond yves.raim...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello!
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 8:36 PM, Dan Brickley dan...@danbri.org wrote:
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 7:56 PM, Ross Singer rossfsin...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, I have a question about something I've run across when trying
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 8:56 PM, Ross Singer rossfsin...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks, Dan. Simon Spero pointed me towards this as well (so I would
like to publicly thank him, too).
My takeaway is that both parties are doing something wrong here:
1) My parser needs to be aware of the context of
, Jan 28, 2010 at 3:54 PM, Yves Raimond yves.raim...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello!
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 8:36 PM, Dan Brickley dan...@danbri.org wrote:
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 7:56 PM, Ross Singer rossfsin...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, I have a question about something I've run across when trying
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 10:44 PM, Yves Raimond yves.raim...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 10:09 PM, Ross Singer rossfsin...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not sure this is what the spec actually says. xml:base deals with
relative URIs (which may be either a relative or absolute path, per
Hello!
Back in April, we had a similar discussion:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-lod/2009Apr/0130.html
Concretely, we are having exactly the same problem for syncing up
aggregations of BBC RDF data (Talis's and OpenLink's), as our data
changes *a lot*.
Right now, we're thinking
I guess it will be as soon as we actually send them a patch :-) I did
some work on that last year (just rdf/xml) but as nick said, the
codebase has been changing very fast since then... We should gather
efforts once the big scary release is out and make it happen!
Cheers,
Y
On 9/6/09, Kurt J
BBC Later + TOTP (link not responding - 2009-04-01)
That's my bad. The site's been down since we forgot to pay our ec2 bills :-/
Having said that the data has either moved or is in the process of moving to
BBC programmes and BBC music so TOTP/Later should probably come off the
cloud piccie
Hello!
I was abroad these last weeks, and unable then to follow this thread with
the necessary attention. It seems however evident to me that, when dealing
contemporaneously with terms like ontology and event, one should have at
least a look at NKRL (Narrative Knowledge Representation
Hello!
Indeed. However, it suffers from one glaring defect, which may simply be a
problem of documentation: i does not explain its terms. In particular, it
refers to a 'factor' of an event, without anywhere saying anything, either
in the axioms or in the documentation, to explain what this
Indeed. However, it suffers from one glaring defect, which may simply be a
problem of documentation: i does not explain its terms. In particular, it
refers to a 'factor' of an event, without anywhere saying anything, either
in the axioms or in the documentation, to explain what this strange
And while the Event ontology doesn't state event:Factor and
geo:SpatialThing to be distinct (maybe they didn't want to make such
statements about other people's terms - with OWL 2 they could do this for
event:factor and event:place now though) I think it's pretty obvious that
you're supposed
The disjoint statement between agent and factor defines factors as
something that doesn't have an active role in the event.
But are necessary for the event to take place? Or play a significant role in
the event, so that if they were not present, the event would have been
different? Or
Hello Leigh!
Can you provide some examples of the data? I was looking for myspace
links in the MusicBrainz data set earlier in the week but couldn't
find any.
This query:
PREFIX mo: http://purl.org/ontology/mo/
SELECT ?myspace WHERE {
?x mo:myspace ?myspace.
}
LIMIT 10
Returns no
Hello!
The links to myspace are using owl:sameAs. The mo:myspace property
points to a document (the myspace page), whereas we're asserting
sameAs links between the same artists in Musicbrainz and Myspace. Try
something like:
PREFIX mo: http://purl.org/ontology/mo/
SELECT ?myspace WHERE {
/03e76712-dab1-4d7c-b347-1db970f93782
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#sameAs
http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ignacio_Mastretta_Rodr\u00EDguez .
I'm not sure it is good practice to do owl:sameAs to html pages, if we are
living in a Linked Data world?
Best
Hugh.
On 16/07/2009 10:46, Yves Raimond
Hello!
(moving this to LOD public as suggested)
General note: I am quite unhappy with a general movement in parts of the LOD
community to clash with the OWL world even when that is absolutely
unnecessary. It is just a bad engineering practice to break with existing
standards unless you can
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 10:16 PM, Martin Hepp
(UniBW)h...@ebusiness-unibw.org wrote:
Yves Raimond wrote:
Ontology modularization is
a pretty difficult task, and people use various heuristics for deciding what
to put in the subset being served for an element. There is no guarantee
Hello!
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 11:38 AM, Danny Ayersdanny.ay...@gmail.com wrote:
Really good to see this work!
May be nothing, but...it appears the tagging date is associated with
the tag. I assume most systems would want to infer that tags with the
same meaning were equivalent (even though
Hello!
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 12:04 PM, Georgi Kobilarov
georgi.kobila...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi all,
I'm currently doing some planning for the future roadmap of DBpedia, and
therefore gathering requirements and use cases.
So I'm wondering:
- Who is using DBpedia today or has evaluated it in
Hello!
Not very linked data friendly (you'll end up with a large proportion of
repeated triples in identical graphs, with different graph URIS), but
certainly better than nothing.
Just jumping on that - is that an issue? I would think not, as you may
want to repeat information across
Hello!
Hopefully we can make one coherent Linked Data Space via xslt at:
http://demo.openlinksw.com/DAV/VAD/rdf_mappers/xslt/lastfm2rdf.xsl
Example:
http://linkeddata.uriburner.com/about/html/http://linkeddata.uriburner.com/about/rdf/http://www.last.fm/music/Con+Funk+Shun%23this
As per
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 8:56 AM, John Goodwin
john.good...@ordnancesurvey.co.uk wrote:
Hi,
We just released a new version of BBC Programmes [1] with
some nice RDF for segments of programmes. I thought it would
be interesting to post it here, as it makes a nice new arrow
in the linked data
Hello!
$ curl -H Accept:
text/html;q=1,application/xhtml+xml,application/xml;q=0.9,*/*;q=0.8,application/rdf+xml;q=0,text/rdf+n3;q=0
http://www.bbc.co.uk/music/artists/149e6720-4e4a-41a4-afca-6d29083fc091
:-)
We're aware of the limitations of mod_rewrite to effectively and correctly
Hello!
We just released a new version of BBC Programmes [1] with some nice
RDF for segments of programmes. I thought it would be interesting to
post it here, as it makes a nice new arrow in the linked data cloud,
from BBC Programmes to BBC Music (and from there to DBpedia).
Here are some example
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 2:08 PM, Yves Raimond yves.raim...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello!
We just released a new version of BBC Programmes [1] with some nice
RDF for segments of programmes. I thought it would be interesting to
post it here, as it makes a nice new arrow in the linked data cloud
Hello!
I know this issue has been raised during the LOD BOF at WWW 2009, but
I don't know if any possible solutions emerged from there.
The problem we are facing is that data on BBC Programmes changes
approximately 50 000 times a day (new/updated
broadcasts/versions/programmes/segments etc.). As
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 2:55 PM, Kingsley Idehen kide...@openlinksw.com wrote:
Yves Raimond wrote:
Hello!
I know this issue has been raised during the LOD BOF at WWW 2009, but
I don't know if any possible solutions emerged from there.
The problem we are facing is that data on BBC
Hi Giovanni!
nothing can beat having a semantic sitemap [1]. Basically you say that you
change 1nce a day and give a link to the dump. Done :-)
Well, the problem is that we don't have an RDF dump, and it is quite
costly to generate one, due to the architecture driving the site
(classic
.
Interested to know what you think.
Cheers,
L.
2009/4/28 Yves Raimond yves.raim...@gmail.com
Hello!
I know this issue has been raised during the LOD BOF at WWW 2009, but
I don't know if any possible solutions emerged from there.
The problem we are facing is that data on BBC Programmes
Hello!
Alternatively, why not take an approach similar to the Wikipedia live feeds,
and push them out on public chat channels; perhaps SPARQL/Update messages on
a read-only Jabber/IRC etc stream? Interested parties are free to consume
them, and use the queries to keep their local copy
Hello Bernard!
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 10:12 AM, Bernard Vatant
bernard.vat...@mondeca.com wrote:
Hello all
I've started refreshing the content of pages at http://lingvoj.org, which
was long overdue.
The data set now links to DBpedia (of course), Freebase and OpenCyc (which
had been broken
Yves: As you may know, we've been working on re-writing mb_server, so if
you look at this, please make sure you look at the current
TemplateToolkit work.
This is where I leave the hard stuff to Yves :)
Heh - Jason is sitting not far from me (BBC contractor working on the
new mb_server), so
Hello!
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 9:02 PM, Dan Brickley dan...@danbri.org wrote:
+cc: Robert, Yves
On 17/2/09 21:52, Simon Reinhardt wrote:
Kingsley Idehen wrote:
We have a new Musicbrainz dump, and it will be integrated into DBpedia
(I think Georgi is working on this). There will soon be a
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 10:13 PM, Kingsley Idehen
kide...@openlinksw.com wrote:
Simon Reinhardt wrote:
Kingsley Idehen wrote:
Don't really know how you could expect me to be associated with output
that wasn't Linked Data in the purest sense. I am not an isolationist :-)
Have you looked at
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 10:57 PM, Kingsley Idehen
kide...@openlinksw.com wrote:
Yves Raimond wrote:
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 10:13 PM, Kingsley Idehen
kide...@openlinksw.com wrote:
Simon Reinhardt wrote:
Kingsley Idehen wrote:
Don't really know how you could expect me to be associated
Hello!
Just to jump on the last thread, something has been bugging me lately.
Please don't take the following as a rant against technologies such as
voiD, Semantic Sitemaps, etc., these are extremely useful piece of
technologies - my rant is more about the order of our priorities, and
about the
Hello!
On Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at 1:23 PM, Hugh Glaser h...@ecs.soton.ac.uk wrote:
My proposal:
*We should not permit any site to be a member of the Linked Data cloud if it
does not provide a simple way of finding URIs from natural language
identifiers.*
Rationale:
One aspect of our Linking
Hello!
Sorry, I just cannot accept that a SPARQL endpoint is th esort of thing that
we should be expecting new casual users to try to use, even with a query
builder.
You made the point about linkage systems - I was answering to that.
I am not suggesting casual users should write SPARQL
Hello!
On 5 Jan 2009, at 10:04, Yves Raimond wrote:
Remember that Aldo was looking for something that allows clients to make
smart decisions about when to follow a link out of an RDF document. He
was
not looking for something to describe the contents of RDF datasets on a
high
level
: pointing clients in the
right direction, by expressing this document holds more persons born
in NYC or this set of RDF triples holds Creative Commons records and
associated tags.
More comments inline.
On 4 Jan 2009, at 14:28, Yves Raimond wrote:
Yves, the proposal above addresses this. There would
Hi Bernhard!
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 11:19 AM, Bernhard Schandl
bernhard.scha...@univie.ac.at wrote:
Hi Yves,
Indeed, that's a bad example - replace it by find here persons born
in NYC and their birth date. It is easy enough to find examples that
involve more than just one property in the
Hi Richard!
On 3 Jan 2009, at 12:23, Richard Cyganiak rich...@cyganiak.de wrote:
On 2 Jan 2009, at 23:20, Yves Raimond wrote:
snip
I proposed this solution:
http://simile.mit.edu/mail/ReadMsg?listName=Linking%20Open%20DatamsgId=20926
And some refinements here:
http://simile.mit.edu/mail
Hello, and happy new year!
Happy new year to all LODers! 2009 will certainly be another interesting
year around here!
Aldo,
The issue you describe below has been discussed in a long thread back in
2007. We mostly talked about a slightly different problem -- where a
resource description
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 2:31 PM, Richard Cyganiak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
François,
We chose the current model (ds1 - containsLinks - ls - target - ds2)
because we want to record which dataset contains the links. We have some use
cases that require this. Your proposal (ds1 - target - ls -
Hello!
On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 4:11 PM, Richard Cyganiak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yves,
On 21 Nov 2008, at 22:30, Yves Raimond wrote:
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 8:08 PM, Giovanni Tummarello
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IMO considering myspace 12 billion triples as part of LOD, is quite
Richard has an excellent point here. This type of data separation is one I
could support.
Jim's question can then be recast as something like, How big is the LOD
cloud excluding wrappers of questionable copyright status?
This view also suggests a community-building step: Someone with moral
Hello!
I guess I asked the question wrong - the linked open data project currently
identifies a specific set of dat resources that are linked together - so
thie entity is definable - I didn't mean to ask how big the whole
Semantic Web is - I meant how many triples are in this particular
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 8:08 PM, Giovanni Tummarello
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Overall, that's about 17 billion.
IMO considering myspace 12 billion triples as part of LOD, is quite a
stretch (same with other wrappers) unless they are provided by the
entity itself (E.g. i WOULD count in
Hello Jim!
So I've been to a number of talks lately where the size of the current (Sept
08 diagram) Linked Open Data cloud, in triples, has been stated - with
numbers that vary quite widely. The esw wiki says 2B triples as of 2007,
which isn't very useful given the growth we've seen in the
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 1:26 PM, Giovanni Tummarello
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
dbtune.org provides at least 14 billion triples (see
http://blog.dbtune.org/post/2008/04/02/DBTune-is-providing-131-billion-triples
+ the Musicbrainz D2R server at http://dbtune.org/musicbrainz/, so I
guess you'd
Hello!
Would be interesting to have the following MusicOntologized and
LinkingOpenData-ed :
https://www.artistdata.com/us/howitworks
Looks nice - a bit like ping.fm, but for music-related data :-)
However, I am not sure what there is to RDFize and interlink there, as
the data is posted to
Hello!
We plan to publish, with Keith, a small how-to for doing a hands-on
tutorial like the Web-of-data 101 session we did at the WOD-PD event.
With Richard's permission, we'll also take a few things from his
session, where he used some of the data we created during our session.
The goal
Hi Danny!
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 11:19 AM, Danny Ayers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi LODites,
I'm going to be doing a tutorial at the SWAP conference in Rome on
15th Dec (main conf is 16th-17th, http://www.swapconf.it/2008/ ).
Provisional title is Publishing Linked Data on the Semantic
Just a small follow-up, the Freebase folks posted the following,
announcing the Freebase RDF:
http://blog.freebase.com/2008/10/30/introducing_the_rdf_service/
where they say they want to link to external ontologies :-)
There is a mailing list available at
Validator to help with some of
this checking: for example
http://idi.fundacionctic.org/vapour?vocabUri=http%3A%2F%2Frdf.freebase.com%2Fns%2Fen.blade_runnerclassUri=http%3A%2F%2FpropertyUri=http%3A%2F%2FinstanceUri=http%3A%2F%2FdefaultResponse=dontmind
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 4:37 AM, Yves
Hello!
Hello!
It depends on whether you know that the external references are
distinct just based on the URI string. If someone links out to
multiple formats using external resource links then they would have to
be counted as multiple links as you have no way of knowing that they
are
Hello!
I thought this would be interesting for this list, as an example of a
service using several LOD sources.
However, it is a bit sad they don't expose the data they produce as
linked data themselves - perhaps we should have a GPL-like license for
LOD datasets if you derive data from this
/,
http://dbtune.org/bbc/peel/ or http://dbtune.org/jamendo/
Cheers!
y
I don't know of a good way to measure the quality or usefulness of a
dataset, and would like to simply claim that it cannot be easily expressed
in a number.
Best,
Richard
On 2 Aug 2008, at 16:23, Yves Raimond wrote
Hello!
We are pleased to announce the release of the preview version of the
Linked Movie DataBase (LinkedMDB): http://www.linkedmdb.org
LinkedMDB aims at publishing the first open linked data dedicated to
movies. It currently contains over three million RDF triples with hundreds
of
TimBL was on the Today programme on Radio 4 this morning (the BBCs prime
morning news/current affairs radio programme) talking about the Semantic
Web, and specifically mentions Linking Open Data:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/today/hi/today/newsid_7496000/7496976.stm
Nice :)
Really nice!
I like
Hello Ian!
I heard the interview too. It was cool (and slightly weird) to hear semantic
web discussed on prime-time news, but I thought that Tim could have used a
more compelling example. The interviewer didn't seem overly impressed by
Tim's find me music by people born within 100 miles
If the best data / tools you have suggest that two docs/datasets are
describing the selfsame entity, using owl:sameAs seems fine, even if you
have a secret hunch you're only perhaps 95% confident of the data quality or
tool reliability. If the best information you have instead is telling you
Hello!
I'd like to ask for comments regarding a topic which IMHO has so far not
been heavily addressed by our community: (fine-grained) interlinking of
multimedia data. At [1] I've put together some initial thoughts. Please
consider sharing your view and reply to this mail and/or add to the
Hello!
Tim just gave a great keynote here at Linked Data Planet here in NYC,
including highlights such as stating again that Linked Open Data is the
semantic web done right, and a paradigm shift all over again - great
encouragement (not that we need any ;) for all the hard work put in by
Hello!
The examples look like the typical result of a SPARQL CONSTRUCT query
against the endpoint. Would it be easier to give a URI which when used
in a construct query against the declared void endpoint, would return
a typical example of what can be expected? This would save people
Hello Giovanni!
These are my final observations on this matter (then i am out :-)
promised).. but as i said if i ever encounter myself the need for such
a thing i'll share the use cases and similarly if such a thing comes
to life and can add interesting features, we're pretty quick to
1 - 100 of 107 matches
Mail list logo
