twitter have a hard task as they have to take into account usage. The
community have evolved their own, inconsistent, usage - for instance this
tweet
greenhaze http://twitter.com/greenhaze
#ffhttp://twitter.com/search?q=%23ffbig up:
@_Jameslloyd http://twitter.com/_Jameslloyd
the main problem is gonna be the cognitive dissonance over whether a
tweet is an information or non-information resource and how many URIs
are needed to fully rep a tweet...
so, who's gonna volunteer to publish the linked data version of
Twitter data, a la db/wiki[pedia] ...
best
Cs
+cc: Ed Summers
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 11:37 AM, Chris Sizemore
chris.sizem...@bbc.co.uk wrote:
the main problem is gonna be the cognitive dissonance over whether a tweet
is an information or non-information resource and how many URIs are needed
to fully rep a tweet...
so, who's gonna
Actually I think my points remain. Would twitter want to use those
definitions that have been formed in the context of a (non live) archive?
Adam
On 16 April 2010 10:42, Dan Brickley dan...@danbri.org wrote:
+cc: Ed Summers
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 11:37 AM, Chris Sizemore
I'm going to look at this this week end.
Will come back with comments.
Seems like the twitter tweet may be a small enough data item for me to grasp
the concepts?
Many thanks.
Adam
On 16 April 2010 13:15, Alexandre Passant alexandre.pass...@deri.orgwrote:
Hi,
On 16 Apr 2010, at 10:37, Chris
Dan Brickley wrote:
+cc: Ed Summers
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 11:37 AM, Chris Sizemore
chris.sizem...@bbc.co.uk wrote:
the main problem is gonna be the cognitive dissonance over whether a tweet
is an information or non-information resource and how many URIs are needed
to fully rep a tweet...
Chris Sizemore wrote:
the main problem is gonna be the cognitive dissonance over whether a
tweet is an information or non-information resource and how many URIs
are needed to fully rep a tweet...
so, who's gonna volunteer to publish the linked data version of
Twitter data, a la
This is all great stuff. So who can now go to Twitter and tell them that
their job has already been done...
Juan Sequeda
+1-575-SEQ-UEDA
www.juansequeda.com
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 10:11 AM, Kingsley Idehen kide...@openlinksw.comwrote:
Chris Sizemore wrote:
the main problem is gonna be the
interesting...
snip
* What will the payloads look like?
This isn't final. The payloads could end up wildly different after we
noodle
around in things like RDF and the semantic web's literature and all that
kind of stuff. You can't see me but my hands are waving vigorously.
/snip
Juan Sequeda
Juan Sequeda wrote:
Hopefully everybody has heard that Twitter will release some annotation
feature which will allow to add metadata to each tweet.
I just read this blog post
http://scobleizer.com/2010/04/15/twitter-annotations/
http://scobleizer.com/2010/04/15/twitter-annotations/and the
Hopefully everybody has heard that Twitter will release some annotation
feature which will allow to add metadata to each tweet.
I just read this blog post
http://scobleizer.com/2010/04/15/twitter-annotations/
http://scobleizer.com/2010/04/15/twitter-annotations/and the following
caught my
11 matches
Mail list logo
