Kingsley Idehen wrote:
Today we have ESPN and co. offering analysis via the traditional one-way
TV medium. Tomorrow, I envisage a conversation space connected by
analytic insights from Joe Public the analyst. Also, what's good for
sports applies to Politics, Finance, Soap Operas, and other
Bob DuCharme wrote:
Kingsley Idehen wrote:
Today we have ESPN and co. offering analysis via the traditional
one-way TV medium. Tomorrow, I envisage a conversation space
connected by analytic insights from Joe Public the analyst. Also,
what's good for sports applies to Politics, Finance,
Nicholas,
I think it would be best to implement the mechanism described here:
http://www.w3.org/TR/cooluris/#hashuri
This would mean:
b00b07kw#episode is the thing
b00b07kw.rdf is the RDF variant
b00b07kw.html is the HTML variant
b00b07kw is a generic, content-negotiated document; it serves
Your suggested implementation looks excellent, and will work well for us.
I have made some changes to the apache configuration for
bbc-programmes.dyndns.org, so it now behaves like this.
Although I still need to sort out the Content-Location and Vary: Accept headers.
The RDF views are not
On 21 Jun 2008, at 23:41, Peter Ansell wrote:
foaf:pagehttp://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b00b07kw.html/foaf:page
Note that in the above notation the page is an actual URL string and
not an RDF resource which is intended because the person already has
the semantic resource and just wants to get
The range is foaf:Document. The domain is owl:Thing.
However, a web page is perfectly fine foaf:Document, different from
the thing that it is about, no I concur with Richard about not
putting a literal - rather:
the thing
foaf:page rdf:resource=http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/
2008/6/22 Alan Ruttenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The target of foaf:page is a thing, a web page.
If you write a literal string, you are saying the foaf page is that string.
That's not what you want to say.
Not if you type it with xsd:anyURI... Is there no separation allowed
between the web and
On Jun 21, 2008, at 10:42 PM, Peter Ansell wrote:
2008/6/22 Alan Ruttenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The target of foaf:page is a thing, a web page.
If you write a literal string, you are saying the foaf page is
that string.
That's not what you want to say.
Not if you type it with
2008/6/22 Alan Ruttenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Jun 21, 2008, at 10:42 PM, Peter Ansell wrote:
2008/6/22 Alan Ruttenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The target of foaf:page is a thing, a web page.
If you write a literal string, you are saying the foaf page is that
string.
That's not what you
