Re: [widgets] MWBP WG Comments of Widgets Reqs LC WD, was Re: Request for Comments on Widgets 1.0 Requirements Last Call WD

2008-09-04 Thread Jo Rabin
Hi Bryan We discussed this note from Marcos on the BP call last week [1] (noting that unfortunately you were not there) - in short we agreed that we had made our contribution, as requested, and that as a group we had nothing further to add. We can discuss again on today's call if you like?

Re: [XMLHttpRequest2] comments

2008-09-04 Thread Anne van Kesteren
On Mon, 11 Aug 2008 00:57:15 +0200, Anne van Kesteren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For when I next edit this draft (hopefully soon): * Origin header shouldn't point to the origin definition. * Exception codes need to be changed. (See XMLHTttpRequest Level 1.) * Upload notifications

Re: [XMLHttpRequest2] comments

2008-09-04 Thread Anne van Kesteren
On Thu, 04 Sep 2008 14:08:02 +0200, Anne van Kesteren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/XMLHttpRequest-2/ contains edits needed for this, as well as some other clarifications and updates from XMLHttpRequest Level 1. In fact, it might be worth publishing another copy

Re: [XHR2] upload complete flag

2008-09-04 Thread Anne van Kesteren
On Mon, 23 Jun 2008 23:17:24 +0200, Olli Pettay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: the draft says that the initial value for upload complete flag is false and then there are several ways to get it set to true. But when is the value set back to false if XHR object is reused? Perhaps '3.5.3

Re: [XHR2] Editorial: OPENED State

2008-09-04 Thread Anne van Kesteren
On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 12:43:15 +0200, Lachlan Hunt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is feedback on the XMLHttpRequest Level 2 draft. In section 3.2 Ready States, the OPENED state is defined, but following those definitions, the spec calls it the OPEN state: The OPEN state has an

Re: [Widgets] R21. Resource Declarations. Was RE: Request for Comments on Widgets 1.0 Requirements Last Call WD

2008-09-04 Thread Marcos Caceres
Hi Bryan, On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 12:06 AM, Sullivan, Bryan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Marcos, My response is late (the review happened just before vacation and other things...), but here it is: I'm not sure there is a semantically useful way to declare/assess resource dependencies

Re: [widgets] CCPP in widgets, was Re: Request for Comments on Widgets 1.0 Requirements Last Call WD

2008-09-04 Thread Marcos Caceres
Hi Bryan, On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 12:18 AM, Sullivan, Bryan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Marcos, Responding a little late (vacations etc), The CCPP use I've proposed is fairly simple, ala the delivery of a link to a capabilities document that is hosted on a web server, and semantically

Re: [XMLHttpRequest2] comments

2008-09-04 Thread Jonas Sicking
Anne van Kesteren wrote: For when I next edit this draft (hopefully soon): * Origin header shouldn't point to the origin definition. * Exception codes need to be changed. (See XMLHTttpRequest Level 1.) * Upload notifications should work non same origin as well. * Download notifications