Hi, WebApps and SVG-
Just to let you know, I will be away for the next week-and-a-half, for a
conference and a short vacation. I will still be checking my email
periodically, but I may not respond very quickly.
Regards-
-Doug Schepers
W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs
Marcos,
Since the element and the widget standards themselves are new, I can't
provide an example of an app store that addresses such issues. App stores tend
to serve a narrow set of devices today, and the vision for widgets overall is
that they are much more interoperable and can thus reach a
On Mon, 04 May 2009 22:25:00 +0200, Travis Leithead
wrote:
> Anne, are you building tests for these assertions as you work out some
> of these details (or more specifically, are you collecting them in a
> public place)?
>
> (I didn't see anything here:
> http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2006/webapi
Anne, are you building tests for these assertions as you work out some of these
details (or more specifically, are you collecting them in a public place)?
(I didn't see anything here:
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2006/webapi/XMLHttpRequest/ )
Thanks,
-Travis
-Original Message-
From: public
On Mon, 4 May 2009, Giovanni Campagna wrote:
> 2009/5/4 Ian Hickson :
> > On Mon, 4 May 2009, Giovanni Campagna wrote:
> >> 2009/5/4 Ian Hickson :
> >> > On Fri, 3 Oct 2008, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> I would recommend to the HTML5 editor to require some reasonable
> >> >> minimum be
2009/5/4 Ian Hickson :
> On Mon, 4 May 2009, Giovanni Campagna wrote:
>> 2009/5/4 Ian Hickson :
>> > On Fri, 3 Oct 2008, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>> >>
>> >> I would recommend to the HTML5 editor to require some reasonable minimum
>> >> because it seems to be de facto required for Web compatibility
On Mon, 4 May 2009, Giovanni Campagna wrote:
> 2009/5/4 Ian Hickson :
> > On Fri, 3 Oct 2008, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
> >>
> >> I would recommend to the HTML5 editor to require some reasonable minimum
> >> because it seems to be de facto required for Web compatibility. I cannot
> >> state with cer
On May 4, 2009, at 9:38 AM, Barstow Art (Nokia-CIC/Boston) wrote:
Kai - this is a good question.
Frederick - we (MC, TLR and I) talked about this in IRC today.
Please
take a look and let us know your thoughts:
<http://krijnhoetmer.nl/irc-logs/webapps/20090504>
-Regards, Art Barst
On 4 May 2009, at 18:42, Marcos Caceres wrote:
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 4:13 PM, Frederick Hirsch
wrote:
The Identifier property is useful for audit and management in the
backend.
I believe this should remain in the specification and should
remain a
normative section, agreeing with Thomas no
On Thu, 26 Mar 2009 09:50:27 +0100, Ian Hickson wrote:
> HTML5 now has a "storage mutex" concept to cope with cookies being set in
> a multiprocess UA architecture without having scripts be exposed to race
> conditions.
>
> This affects XHR in a couple of ways.
>
> For both sync and async XHR, we
t;> Frederick - we (MC, TLR and I) talked about this in IRC today. Please
>> take a look and let us know your thoughts:
>>
>> <http://krijnhoetmer.nl/irc-logs/webapps/20090504>
>>
>> -Regards, Art Barstow
>>
>>
>> On May 1, 2009, at 6:49 AM, ext
On Mon, 13 Apr 2009 15:33:14 +0200, Arthur Barstow
wrote:
> What are the next steps for the XHR L1 spec?
I am in the process of rewriting parts of XMLHttpRequest Level 1 so that it
matches reality better with respect to how to determine the origin and base URL
of an XMLHttpRequest object. At t
On 4 May 2009, at 16:13, Frederick Hirsch wrote:
The Identifier property is useful for audit and management in the
backend. I believe this should remain in the specification and
should remain a normative section, agreeing with Thomas note in the
chat. It was added based on requirements fro
ton) wrote:
Kai - this is a good question.
Frederick - we (MC, TLR and I) talked about this in IRC today. Please
take a look and let us know your thoughts:
<http://krijnhoetmer.nl/irc-logs/webapps/20090504>
-Regards, Art Barstow
On May 1, 2009, at 6:49 AM, ext Kai Hendry wrote:
http://dev
Kai - this is a good question.
Frederick - we (MC, TLR and I) talked about this in IRC today. Please
take a look and let us know your thoughts:
<http://krijnhoetmer.nl/irc-logs/webapps/20090504>
-Regards, Art Barstow
On May 1, 2009, at 6:49 AM, ext Kai Hendry wrote:
http://dev.
On 1 May 2009, at 12:49, Kai Hendry wrote:
http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-digsig/#identifier-signature-property
I'm not sure what "signature management" is exactly, though can
someone please inform me what a UA is supposed to do with
dsp:Identifier?
The primary use case here is not the
2009/5/4 Ian Hickson :
> On Fri, 3 Oct 2008, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>>
>> I would recommend to the HTML5 editor to require some reasonable minimum
>> because it seems to be de facto required for Web compatibility. I cannot
>> state with certainty that nothing lower than 10ms is safe. Chrome
>> sh
I'm satisfied with the resolutions below.
Max.
Marcos Caceres writes:
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 2:04 PM, Max Froumentin wrote:
>> Hi Marcos,
>>
>> All changes approved, except the 2 below:
>>
>> Marcos Caceres writes:
>>
5. [Dependencies on Other Specifications] The last 2 statements log
18 matches
Mail list logo
