Robin Berjon:
> - I forget the original reasoning: is it useful that the event
> initialisers have canBubbleArg and cancelableArg since presumably no
> matter what parameter is passed they won't bubble and won't be
> cancellable?
Shouldn’t canBubbleArg and cancelableArg be honoured when us
On Wed, 15 Jul 2009, Bil Corry wrote:
> Ian Hickson wrote on 7/14/2009 6:37 PM:
> > On Tue, 14 Jul 2009, Bil Corry wrote:
> >> Ian Hickson wrote on 7/14/2009 12:49 AM:
> >>> (Trimmed cc list to avoid cross-posting.)
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, 25 Jun 2009, Bil Corry wrote:
> Thanks for the clarifica
On Wed, 15 Jul 2009, Nikunj R. Mehta wrote:
>
> The abstract still states:
> [[
> This specification defines two APIs for persistent data storage in Web
> clients: one for accessing key-value pair data and another for accessing
> structured data.
> ]]
> Nikunj
> http://o-micron.blogspot.com
Oops.
Ian Hickson wrote on 7/14/2009 6:37 PM:
> On Tue, 14 Jul 2009, Bil Corry wrote:
>> Ian Hickson wrote on 7/14/2009 12:49 AM:
>>> (Trimmed cc list to avoid cross-posting.)
>>>
>>> On Thu, 25 Jun 2009, Bil Corry wrote:
Thanks for the clarification. Will there be some mechanism within HTML5
>>
The abstract still states:
[[
This specification defines two APIs for persistent data storage in Web
clients: one for accessing key-value pair data and another for
accessing structured data.
]]
Nikunj
http://o-micron.blogspot.com
On Jul 15, 2009, at 3:56 AM, Ian Hickson wrote:
On Thu, 25
On 7/15/09 5:56 PM, Jean-Claude Dufourd wrote:
Dear Robin,
Thanks for your email.
Robin Berjon a écrit :
There would then be a good case for the WG to spend some time on
devising a proper workaround.
Anyone sharing my opinion that the widget update feature will be
consistenly implemented (
Dear Robin,
Thanks for your email.
Robin Berjon a écrit :
There would then be a good case for the WG to spend some time on
devising a proper workaround.
Anyone sharing my opinion that the widget update feature will be
consistenly implemented (even if optional) ?
You seem to be mixing up Wi
Le lundi 13 juillet 2009 à 13:38 +0200, Marcin Hanclik a écrit :
> I cannot publish the source code now, also due to the immaturity of the tool.
I personally wouldn't mind that immaturity and would be happy to
contribute in making it more mature.
> The tool was developed to fit the format used wi
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 2:13 PM, Laxmi Narsimha Rao
Oruganti wrote:
> Hey folks,
>
>
>
> I have been trying to get a hold of Web Storage Specification as PDF
> (http://www.w3.org/TR/webstorage/). Can you please help me find PDF for
> web storage spec?
>
There is no PDF.
>
> Multiple other poi
Hey folks,
I have been trying to get a hold of Web Storage Specification as PDF
(http://www.w3.org/TR/webstorage/).Can you please help me find PDF for web
storage spec?
Multiple other points about the same aspect:
- It was also difficult for me to find this URL as all the interne
Dear Jean-Claude,
On Jul 15, 2009, at 13:54 , Jean-Claude Dufourd wrote:
Marcos Caceres a écrit :
From the spec "...an author can request that a widget asynchronously
check if a widget has been updated [(i.e., that a new version of the
widget package is available online)] via the widget.update
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 1:54 PM, Jean-Claude
Dufourd wrote:
> Marcos Caceres a écrit :
>
> >From the spec "...an author can request that a widget asynchronously
> check if a widget has been updated [(i.e., that a new version of the
> widget package is available online)] via the widget.update() meth
Hi,
I just went through the WM ED and here are the things to do that I
gathered (the list may not be exhaustive). Input and help is welcome,
feel free to flag what you'd like to volunteer for.
- The Abstract needs to be rewritten, it's not entirely easy to
understand what it describes.
Marcos Caceres a écrit :
>From the spec "...an author can request that a widget asynchronously
check if a widget has been updated [(i.e., that a new version of the
widget package is available online)] via the widget.update() method,
defined in the Widgets-API specification. This strategy also rel
On Thu, 25 Jun 2009, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
> On Jun 24, 2009, at 11:35 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
> > [...] (if anything, I think we should split Web Storage into two
> > further specs [...]
>
> [...] I would prefer to see SQL Storage split out of the rest of Web
> Storage. We seem to have rough
Hello all,
Le lundi 13 juillet 2009 à 11:57 +0200, Breitschwerdt, Christian,
VF-Group a écrit :
> More information regarding registration, etc to follow shortly via W3C
> staff/WG chairs.
If you are interested in attending that event, please register at:
http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/1/widget-te
16 matches
Mail list logo