[fileapi] urn - URL

I don't see a reason why we should call the member urn. URL is much more consistent with other parts of the Web platform and works just as well. I thought we agreed on this previously so I'm just mentioning it here since it seems to have changed again. -- Anne van Kesteren

RE: [FileAPI] Latest Revision of Editor's Draft

On Tuesday, October 27, 2009 2:35 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote: On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 12:36 AM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote: I would like to see implementation feedback on this. I don't understand why we would want to assign semantics to urn:uuid: URLs that are so specific -- that seems

Use Cases and Requirements for Saving Files Securely

Hi, Folks- During the TPAC joint meeting between the WebApps and DAP WGs, we discussed security policies and use cases and requirements around saving files in different scenarios: public web resources (web pages and apps), widgets, mobile device and desktop browsers, locally-installed

Re: Web Data APIs

Thanks Pablo for reviewing the spec and providing valuable feedback on improving it. I have been incorporating feedback in to the editor's draft as I get it. I expect some more work before turning around and asking the WG to publish another draft. Please continue to send feedback on this

ISSUE-108: confused deputy problem [CORS]

ISSUE-108: confused deputy problem [CORS] http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/track/issues/108 Raised by: Anne van Kesteren On product: CORS See http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2009AprJun/1324.html and follow up. Also see minutes of Santa Clara F2F.

Re: Web Data APIs

On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 2:57 PM, Nikunj R. Mehta nikunj.me...@oracle.comwrote: Thanks Pablo for reviewing the spec and providing valuable feedback on improving it. I have been incorporating feedback in to the editor's draft as I get it. I expect some more work before turning around and asking

[WARP] Comments to WARP spec

Here are the comments I had to the WARP spec in the Webapps/DAP joint meeting: 1) Does * grant/require either HTTP or HTTPS as schemes? It would be better to allow https://*/; or http://*/; distinctly since some applications may not be allowed by policy to access specific sources using non-secure

[widgets] View modes security considerations

Hi there, As promised and discussed this afternoon, some basic text for a Security Considerations section in the widgets view modes spec: Security Considerations Implementers of this specification are asked to take into account and design appropriate measures to deal with the

More CORS Tuesday afternoon...

Hi folks, http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/wiki/TPAC2009APIs#Tuesday.2C_November_3 We have included a one hour slot in the agenda 15:15-16:15 to continue the CORS discussion on the Confused Deputy problem. Given the current diversity of views I am expecting to determine points of agreement,

TPAC first day...

Hi folks, a quick summary of today's meeting - there are also draft minutes available: http://www.w3.org/2009/11/02-webapps-minutes.html plus http://www.w3.org/2009/11/02-dap-minutes.html#item05 until lunch for the joint session with DAP We talked about progress events and the agreement

WebApps' publication plans

Earlier today I added a new Plans column to WebApps' two publication status tables: APIs specs: http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/wiki/PubStatus#API_Specifications Widget specs: http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/wiki/PubStatus#Widgets_Specifications For most of the specs, I entered what I think

[WARP] IRI normalization only for HTTP*?

Hi, WARP requires normalization of IRI using ToASCII only for HTTP and HTTPS uris — is there any reason for that? Dom

Constrained specification of Icon element

The icon element (http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets/#icon0 http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets/ ) has width/height properties which only applies to SVG icons. To me the spec isn't fully clear how to use them. Is it ok for a user agent to ignore the width/height of an SVG icon? IMO it should be

Re: [FileAPI] Latest Revision of Editor's Draft

On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 12:25 PM, Adrian Bateman adria...@microsoft.com wrote: On Tuesday, October 27, 2009 2:35 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote: On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 12:36 AM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote: I would like to see implementation feedback on this. I don't understand why we would

Re: Use Cases and Requirements for Saving Files Securely

On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 12:48 PM, Doug Schepers schep...@w3.org wrote: Hi, Folks- During the TPAC joint meeting between the WebApps and DAP WGs, we discussed security policies and use cases and requirements around saving files in different scenarios: public web resources (web pages and apps),

Re: Web Data APIs

On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 10:25 AM, Pablo Castro pablo.cas...@microsoft.com wrote: We’ve been looking at the web database space here at Microsoft, trying to understand scenarios and requirements. After assessing what was out there we are forming an opinion around this. I wanted to write to this