Hi all,
The algorithm for processing the 'required' attribute is unclear. It says:
If a required attribute is used, then let required-feature be the result of
applying the rule for getting a single attribute value to the required attribute. If
required-feature is not a valid boolean value,
Hi,
The test df.wgt contains a feature without name. In this case, the feature
element is ignored and the widget remains valid.
The test d4.wgt contains an invalid feature name. In this case, the widget
should be considered as invalid. I don't understand that. I understand the
rationale that
Hi all,
There is a test in the test suite for duplicated param element with the same
name but different value (v9.wgt). But I did not find, a similar test for
duplicated feature elements with the same name. Is this allowed or not ? The
algorithm in Step 7 does not say.
Regards,
Cyril
--
On Dec 7, 2009, at 7:46 PM, Barstow Art (Nokia-CIC/Boston) wrote:
This is a Call for Consensus (CfC) to publish a Last Call Working
Draft of the following specs:
1. Server-Sent Events
http://dev.w3.org/html5/eventsource/
2. Web SQL Database
http://dev.w3.org/html5/webdatabase/
3. Web
Robmin,
The specification says that in some view modes the widget user agent will
use the width and high specified in the config.xml file.
What would happened in such a view mode if they were not mentioned?
אייל סלע | מנהל פרויקטים, הועדה הטכנולוגית ומשרד ה-W3C הישראלי | איגוד
האינטרנט הישראלי
The Widgets 1.0: Packaging and Configuration working draft says that There
is only one class of product that can claim conformance to this
specification: a user agent..
The standard specify features of Widgets, not only of widget user agents,
then why can't a Widget itself be claimed to
Below is the draft agenda for the 17 December Widgets Voice
Conference (VC).
Inputs and discussion before the VC on all of the agenda topics via
public-webapps is encouraged (as it can result in a shortened meeting).
Please address Open/Raised Issues and Open Actions before the meeting:
Hi,
I will not be able to attend the call tomorrow.
Thanks,
Marcin
Marcin Hanclik
ACCESS Systems Germany GmbH
Tel: +49-208-8290-6452 | Fax: +49-208-8290-6465
Mobile: +49-163-8290-646
E-Mail: marcin.hanc...@access-company.com
(Moving this thread over to the WebApps WG.)
On Sat, 05 Dec 2009 00:06:35 +0100, Alexey Proskuryakov a...@webkit.org
wrote:
On 04.12.2009, at 14:30, Jonas Sicking wrote:
However for the events that are fired as a result of network activity,
I see no reason to fire these events asynchronously
On Wed, 25 Nov 2009 21:46:59 +0100, Klotz, Leigh leigh.kl...@xerox.com
wrote:
This comment on XMLHttpRequest [1] is from the Forms WG.
A standalone W3C Recommendation-track document is welcome, particularly
because of the statement in [2] The goal of this specification is to
document a
On Thu, 26 Nov 2009 18:25:57 +0100, Richard Ishida ish...@w3.org wrote:
Hopefully you'll get a formal response from the i18n WG shortly. In the
meantime, I have only a couple of personal editorial suggestions:
I have not seen a response from the i18n WG.
[1] 2.2 terminology
It would help
On Tue, 15 Dec 2009 08:06:35 +0100, Huub Schaeks
h...@h-schaeks.speedlinq.nl wrote:
The third sentence in section 4.1 reads:
When the XMLHttpRequest object used in other contexts their values
will have to be defined as appropriate for that context.
I think the word is, is missing in the first
On Wed, 09 Dec 2009 11:33:25 +0100, s...@rckc.at s...@rckc.at wrote:
http://kuza55.blogspot.com/2007/07/exploiting-reflected-xss.html
-- Eduardo
It seems it is not considered an issue for same-origin requests per that
page and cross-origin requests are only dealt with in XMLHttpRequest Level
Hmm well, the only difference is that this attacks would now work
same-site.. I mean..
XHR is restricting that user-agent, and other headers shouldn't be sent,
supposedly to protect the JS code to send wrong headers to the server, but
if the restriction can be fooled using a _, isn't the
On Wed, 16 Dec 2009, Arthur Barstow wrote:
Several members of the group (Nikunj[1], Charles[2], Arun[3], Art[4],
Adrian[5]) raised concerns about Web SQL Database where the primary
concerns raised are the normative User agents must implement the SQL
dialect supported by Sqlite 3.6.19
On Wed, 16 Dec 2009, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
(Moving this thread over to the WebApps WG.)
On Sat, 05 Dec 2009 00:06:35 +0100, Alexey Proskuryakov a...@webkit.org
wrote:
On 04.12.2009, at 14:30, Jonas Sicking wrote:
However for the events that are fired as a result of network activity,
Hi Jonas,
On Dec 10, 2009, at 19:42 , Jonas Sicking wrote:
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 9:03 AM, Robin Berjon ro...@berjon.com wrote:
[Constructor(DOMString mediaType, DOMString fileName)]
interface FileWriter {
// saving operations
void save (DOMString content, optional DOMString encoding,
Thanks Marcin for your response, my comments are embedded below, marked with
[YA]
-Original Message-
From: ext Marcin Hanclik [mailto:marcin.hanc...@access-company.com]
Sent: Monday, December 07, 2009 9:01 AM
To: Barstow Art (Nokia-CIC/Boston); public-webapps
Cc: Aharon Yael
On Dec 16, 2009, at 11:54 AM, ext Ian Hickson wrote:
On Wed, 16 Dec 2009, Arthur Barstow wrote:
Several members of the group (Nikunj[1], Charles[2], Arun[3], Art[4],
Adrian[5]) raised concerns about Web SQL Database where the primary
concerns raised are the normative User agents must
On Wed, 16 Dec 2009, Arthur Barstow wrote:
On Dec 16, 2009, at 11:54 AM, ext Ian Hickson wrote:
On Wed, 16 Dec 2009, Arthur Barstow wrote:
Several members of the group (Nikunj[1], Charles[2], Arun[3],
Art[4], Adrian[5]) raised concerns about Web SQL Database where the
primary
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 9:37 AM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
On another note, while reading the spec I noticed that no task is queued
to updated responseText. Does that mean that if I check it continually in
a tight loop within a task, I can see it change?
I think the spec should say that
Anne,
Thank you for your corrections and updates.
I'd like to suggest that the main issue is dependency of the XHR document on
concepts where HTML5 is the only specification that defines several core
concepts of the Web platform architecture, such as event loops, event handler
attributes,
I'll take this as a No and we'll discuss it in the Forms WG next year when we
pick up again.
Happy Holidays, Ian, Anne, and all.
Leigh.
-Original Message-
From: Ian Hickson [mailto:i...@hixie.ch]
Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2009 11:54 AM
To: Klotz, Leigh
Cc: Anne van Kesteren;
If this is the case, it shouldn't be too much work then to take out the parts
that don't need to be implemented and put them into a separate, rec-track
document entitled roughly XHR for HTML5.
Leigh.
-Original Message-
From: Jonas Sicking [mailto:jo...@sicking.cc]
Sent: Wednesday,
On Dec 16, 2009, at 2:46 PM, ext Ian Hickson wrote:
What's the deadline by which we have to have submitted a request? If
there's time, I'd like to address Adrian's feedback on the Web
Sockets API
and then either publish it as LC (if Adrian agrees) or at least WD.
The deadline is 18
On Wed, 16 Dec 2009, Klotz, Leigh wrote:
Therefore, even in the light of the changes in details I've cited
(and your kind corrections for my errors and outdated imformation),
our request that you abstract out the dependencies on HTML5 into a
separate document (perhaps part of the
On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 20:46:03 +0100, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
What's the deadline by which we have to have submitted a request? If
there's time, I'd like to address Adrian's feedback on the Web Sockets
API and then either publish it as LC (if Adrian agrees) or at least WD.
I think it
Thank you. It does seem like a daunting amount of effort, and I hope it
doesn't cause the XHR draft to be derailed.
Things that are impossible just take longer ;-)
Leigh.
-Original Message-
From: Ian Hickson [mailto:i...@hixie.ch]
Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2009 12:13 PM
To:
On Dec 4, 2009, at 9:41 AM, Joseph Pecoraro wrote:
- 4.1.1 Examples
http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/DataCache/#examples
Last code example is improperly indented.
Fixed
- 4.2.1 Opening a Cache has a typo in Step 3.2
http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/DataCache/#opening-cache
If data cache group
On Dec 7, 2009, at 12:01 PM, Joseph Pecoraro wrote:
Some more DataCache API Corrections:
- 4.1.1. Examples
http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/DataCache/#examples
No such thing as finish() used in the first example. Perhaps this
should be commit()?
[[
cache.transaction(function(txn) {
- 4.2.2.1. Starting a transaction - Rules should be switched.
http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/DataCache/#starting-a-transaction
first arm: (these should be swapped)
3.3 - Mark transaction as off-line.
3.4 - Create a new cache transaction called transaction and set data cache
to be its
On Dec 16, 2009, at 4:09 PM, Joseph Pecoraro wrote:
- 4.2.2.1. Starting a transaction - Rules should be switched.
http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/DataCache/#starting-a-transaction
first arm: (these should be swapped)
3.3 - Mark transaction as off-line.
3.4 - Create a new cache transaction
- 4.2.7. Transaction API
http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/DataCache/#transaction-interface
Extra whitespace for the oncommitted event.
[[
IDL
interface CacheTransaction {
void getItem(in DOMString uri, ItemCallback callback);
void release(in DOMString uri);
void commit();
//
Great work on the updates! I have a few new corrections that I hadn't yet
submitted and still seem relevant in the new draft.
- 4.3.1 Local Server API
http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/DataCache/#request-interface
Make MutableHttpResponse extend HttpResponse? It has methods, but no attributes
to
On Dec 16, 2009, at 4:09 PM, ext Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 20:46:03 +0100, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
What's the deadline by which we have to have submitted a request? If
there's time, I'd like to address Adrian's feedback on the Web
Sockets
API and then
On Dec 10, 2009, at 11:45 AM, Joseph Pecoraro wrote:
The specification does not say when a CacheTransaction's status
changes to committed. This should be a trivial addition.
- 4.2.2. Constructing and modifying data caches
http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/DataCache/#transaction-status
The spec
(bcc public-webapps since not as relevant)
I actually think the TAG discussions about versioning and the use of version
indicators has been helpful, but it's been hard to drive this to a publication,
because there's still some work to be done. However, I think the main insight
I've had is that
Without the benefit of full context (I only started following this list
recently), I'd like cautiously to suggest that the UM solution to Ian's
challenge seems awkward because the challenge is itself a poor design, and
UM tends to be more difficult to work with when used to implement designs
that
On Wed, 16 Dec 2009, Kenton Varda wrote:
Without the benefit of full context (I only started following this list
recently), I'd like cautiously to suggest that the UM solution to Ian's
challenge seems awkward because the challenge is itself a poor design,
and UM tends to be more difficult
There is no way to remove a handler, or all handlers for a particular
namespace, after some have been registered. However, this may be a
valid design decision, because there probably aren't compelling use
cases for removing or replacing handlers. The only time I ran into
this need was running
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 9:25 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
A concrete example of the example I was talking about is Google's Finance
GData API. There's a fixed URL on A (Google's site) that represents my
finance information. There's a site B (my portal page) that is hard-coded
to fetch
I have changed to using the new method immediate and that also removed this
call.
Immediate looks useful. The specification for immediate is:
[[
When this method is called, the user agent creates a new cache transaction, and
performs the steps to add a resource to be captured in that cache
Another example would be an XBL binding file on hixie.ch that is
accessible only to pages on damowmow.com. With CORS I can do this with one
line in my .htaccess file. I don't see how to do it at all with UM.
Seems to me that these examples can just as easily be done with IE's
XDomainRequest.
On Wed, 16 Dec 2009, Devdatta wrote:
Another example would be an XBL binding file on hixie.ch that is
accessible only to pages on damowmow.com. With CORS I can do this with one
line in my .htaccess file. I don't see how to do it at all with UM.
Seems to me that these examples can just
hmm.. just a XDR GET on the file at hixie.ch which allows access only
if the request is from damowmow.com ?
I am not sure -- is there anything special about XBL bindings which
would result in this not working ?
Cheers
devdatta
2009/12/16 Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch:
On Wed, 16 Dec 2009, Devdatta
On Dec 16, 2009, at 11:30 PM, Devdatta wrote:
hmm.. just a XDR GET on the file at hixie.ch which allows access only
if the request is from damowmow.com ?
I am not sure -- is there anything special about XBL bindings which
would result in this not working ?
If I recall correctly, XDR sends
On Dec 16, 2009, at 9:10 PM, Kenton Varda wrote:
Without the benefit of full context (I only started following this
list recently), I'd like cautiously to suggest that the UM solution
to Ian's challenge seems awkward because the challenge is itself a
poor design, and UM tends to be more
47 matches
Mail list logo
