Ok.
Want to write up a proposal for how to implement this (presumably in a bug)?
J
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 6:38 AM, ben turner b...@mozilla.com wrote:
I would also point out that throwing exceptions at the call site makes
debugging much easier in my opinion. Our error events currently don't
No, it is in webapps (all the widgets work is there) - try:
public-webapps@w3.org
Cheers!
David.
-Original Message-
From: Ricardo Varela [mailto:pho...@gmail.com]
Sent: 02 July 2010 09:02
To: David Rogers
Subject: Re: question about number of occurrences of author and content
On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 22:39:48 +0200, Boris Zbarsky bzbar...@mit.edu wrote:
On 6/29/10 2:36 PM, Chris Wilson wrote:
See, this is exactly why we asked the question - because it seems that
behavior is inconsistent, we're not sure what the expectation is.
Note that the Firefox behavior I
I think I would be happy just removing the _NO_DUPLICATE directions.
As Jeremy noted it is quite easy to emulate and it would then be up to
the webapp author whether she wanted the first or last duplicate
value.
-Ben
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 11:56 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On
I think I would be happy just removing the _NO_DUPLICATE directions.
As Jeremy noted it is quite easy to emulate and it would then be up to
the webapp author whether she wanted the first or last duplicate
value.
-Ben
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 11:56 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On
I would also point out that throwing exceptions at the call site makes
debugging much easier in my opinion. Our error events currently don't
include information like filename and line number where the failing
request was generated (though I think we should add that eventually).
Exceptions are much
I would also point out that throwing exceptions at the call site makes
debugging much easier in my opinion. Our error events currently don't
include information like filename and line number where the failing
request was generated (though I think we should add that eventually).
Exceptions are much
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10064
Summary: Modifying functions should throw when called under
invalid conditions
Product: WebAppsWG
Version: unspecified
Platform: PC
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Filed http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10064 if you want
help with the editing, or this is unclear, let me know.
/ Jonas
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 12:56 AM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
Ok.
Want to write up a proposal for how to implement this (presumably in a bug)?
J
On
Hi Ricardo,
(moving discussion to public-webapps)
On 7/2/10 5:56 AM, Ricardo Varela wrote:
hallo all, hallo Marcos,
We have a small question regarding what we interpret may be an
inconsistency in the behaviours for parsing a config file as commented
in the W3C widget packaging spec [1]
* Jonas Sicking wrote:
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 1:29 AM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@opera.com wrote:
On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 22:39:48 +0200, Boris Zbarsky bzbar...@mit.edu wrote:
I think Anne answered the question, in any case: the XHR event target
chain only contains the XHR object itself and nothing
On Fri, 02 Jul 2010 12:57:08 +0200, Bjoern Hoehrmann derhoe...@gmx.net
wrote:
* Anne van Kesteren wrote:
You have to read DOM Events either way.
Not to answer the particular question. Sure, you might have read the DOM
Events specification, say, to figure out what Event.currentTarget is but
* Anne van Kesteren wrote:
You'd have to read it to figure out what the event flow is, for instance.
Which is something that is much more likely to stick with you, yes.
I disagree. Only Node objects have event flow and the Window object
interacts with those in a particular way. All other
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 2:17 AM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
Additionally, the structured clone algorithm, which defines that an
exception should synchronously be thrown if the object is malformed,
for example if it consists of a cyclic graph. So .add/.put/.update can
already throw
Jonas Sicking [mailto:jo...@sicking.cc] wrote:
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 1:29 AM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@opera.com wrote:
On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 22:39:48 +0200, Boris Zbarsky bzbar...@mit.edu wrote:
On 6/29/10 2:36 PM, Chris Wilson wrote:
See, this is exactly why we asked the question - because it
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 3:03 AM, Bjoern Hoehrmann derhoe...@gmx.net wrote:
* Jonas Sicking wrote:
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 1:29 AM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@opera.com wrote:
On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 22:39:48 +0200, Boris Zbarsky bzbar...@mit.edu wrote:
I think Anne answered the question, in any case:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10064
Andrei Popescu andr...@google.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 10:43 AM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
Filed http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10064
Fixed. Please have a look, in case I missed or got anything wrong. Thanks!
Andrei
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 1:02 PM, Andrei Popescu andr...@google.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 10:43 AM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
Filed http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10064
Fixed. Please have a look, in case I missed or got anything wrong. Thanks!
For add and put
On Jun 30, 2010, at 10:29 AM, Eric Uhrhane wrote:
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 10:18 AM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
May I propose FileWriter in place of BlobWriter? ;-)
You are actually always writing to files, so it would make a lot of sense
IMO.
We renamed BlobReader based on
Can you point me to where? XHR L2 spec says To dispatch a readystatechange
event means that an event with the name readystatechange, with no namespace,
which does not bubble and is not cancelable, and which uses the Event
interface, is to be dispatched at the XMLHttpRequest object. (end of
Hi All,
We ran into an complicated issue while implementing IndexedDB. In
short, what should happen if an object store is modified while a
cursor is iterating it? Note that the modification can be done within
the same transaction, so the read/write locks preventing several
transactions from
From: public-webapps-requ...@w3.org [mailto:public-webapps-requ...@w3.org] On
Behalf Of Jonas Sicking
Sent: Friday, July 02, 2010 4:00 PM
We ran into an complicated issue while implementing IndexedDB. In short,
what should happen if an object store is modified while a cursor is
iterating
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 4:40 PM, Pablo Castro pablo.cas...@microsoft.com wrote:
From: public-webapps-requ...@w3.org [mailto:public-webapps-requ...@w3.org] On
Behalf Of Jonas Sicking
Sent: Friday, July 02, 2010 4:00 PM
We ran into an complicated issue while implementing IndexedDB. In short,
On Sat, Jul 3, 2010 at 1:14 AM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 4:40 PM, Pablo Castro pablo.cas...@microsoft.com
wrote:
From: public-webapps-requ...@w3.org [mailto:public-webapps-requ...@w3.org]
On Behalf Of Jonas Sicking
Sent: Friday, July 02, 2010 4:00 PM
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 9:45 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 1:02 PM, Andrei Popescu andr...@google.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 10:43 AM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
Filed http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10064
Fixed. Please have a
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 5:44 PM, Andrei Popescu andr...@google.com wrote:
On Sat, Jul 3, 2010 at 1:14 AM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 4:40 PM, Pablo Castro pablo.cas...@microsoft.com
wrote:
From: public-webapps-requ...@w3.org
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 2:52 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
On Jun 30, 2010, at 10:29 AM, Eric Uhrhane wrote:
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 10:18 AM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
May I propose FileWriter in place of BlobWriter? ;-)
You are actually always writing to files, so
On Sat, Jul 3, 2010 at 11:09 AM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 5:44 PM, Andrei Popescu andr...@google.com wrote:
On Sat, Jul 3, 2010 at 1:14 AM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 4:40 PM, Pablo Castro
pablo.cas...@microsoft.com
On Sat, Jul 3, 2010 at 11:09 AM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 5:44 PM, Andrei Popescu andr...@google.com wrote:
On Sat, Jul 3, 2010 at 1:14 AM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 4:40 PM, Pablo Castro
pablo.cas...@microsoft.com
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 7:27 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
On Sat, Jul 3, 2010 at 11:09 AM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 5:44 PM, Andrei Popescu andr...@google.com wrote:
On Sat, Jul 3, 2010 at 1:14 AM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 3:31 PM, Eric Uhrhane er...@google.com wrote:
The biggest unknown in the current BlobWriter spec [1] is how you
obtain one in the first place.
There are two current proposals, which I've summarized below. I've
heard only a few voices on this topic, and would love to get
32 matches
Mail list logo
