On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 03:58:24 +0200, Eric Uhrhane er...@google.com wrote:
XHR will have a responseBlob property.
Indeed:
http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/XMLHttpRequest-2/#the-responseblob-attribute
:-)
(I also fixed the issue of not resetting the credentials flag and the
request timeout
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10453
Andrei Popescu andr...@google.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10165
Andrei Popescu andr...@google.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10307
Andrei Popescu andr...@google.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10400
Andrei Popescu andr...@google.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
On Sat, 21 Aug 2010 03:59:09 +0200, Devdatta Akhawe dev.akh...@gmail.com
wrote:
It seems that over here facebook is a benign server that some time in
the past assumed that XHR can only be same origin, and with the
introduction of cross origin XHR is suddenly vulnerable to XSS. In
general, a
On Fri, 13 Aug 2010 00:13:16 +0200, João Eiras joao.ei...@gmail.com
wrote:
Between the boolean and an integer, the integer is more useful, although
seeing long redirection chains is somewhat rare and overkill.
I went for a boolean followRedirects attribute as that gives sufficient
Anne proposes WebApps publish a new WD of XHR Level 2 and this is a Call
for Consensus to do so:
http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/XMLHttpRequest-2/
If you have any comments or concerns about this proposal, please send
them to public-webapps by September 3 at the latest.
As with all of our
Doug and the folks working on the DOM 3 Events spec believe the spec is
now feature-complete and would like to publish a Last Call Working Draft
of the spec. As such, this is a Call for Consensus to publish the
following document as the LCWD:
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 2:12 AM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 8:17 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 6:45 AM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 7:34 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
I support this.
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 9:04 AM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com wrote:
Anne proposes WebApps publish a new WD of XHR Level 2 and this is a Call for
Consensus to do so:
http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/XMLHttpRequest-2/
If you have any comments or concerns about this
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9823
Ian 'Hixie' Hickson i...@hixie.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 2:04 PM, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.org wrote:
I noticed that FileWriter.truncate() can only be used to shorten a file, and
there does not seem to be a good way to grow a file using FileWriter without
appending data to it. By contrast, the POSIX ftruncate function can
13 matches
Mail list logo
