On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 11:38 PM, Pablo Castro
pablo.cas...@microsoft.com wrote:
(sorry for my random out-of-timing previous email on this thread. please see
below for an actually up to date reply)
-Original Message-
From: Jonas Sicking [mailto:jo...@sicking.cc]
Sent: Monday,
Hi.
Its been 3 month and we still dont have a reply? Should we seek establishing
official test suites our selves outside the w3c?
On 16 Nov 2010 11:46, Anne van Kesteren ann...@opera.com wrote:
Marcos Caceres from Opera started a wiki on Testing Requirements some time
ago. I just updated it to
On Tue, 15 Feb 2011 09:54:18 +0100, Marcos Caceres marc...@opera.com
wrote:
Its been 3 month and we still dont have a reply? Should we seek
establishing official test suites our selves outside the w3c?
I think you might have missed this email by PLH:
Quoting Anne van Kesteren ann...@opera.com:
On Tue, 15 Feb 2011 09:54:18 +0100, Marcos Caceres marc...@opera.com wrote:
Its been 3 month and we still dont have a reply? Should we seek
establishing official test suites our selves outside the w3c?
I think you might have missed this email by
On Tue, 15 Feb 2011 10:42:15 +0100, marc...@opera.com wrote:
Quoting Anne van Kesteren ann...@opera.com:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-testsuite/2011Feb/0022.html
It covers basics and some of security (from the wiki). Should give us
plenty of headway I think.
Great! what
As I mentioned at TPAC I wanted DOM Core to include the fundamentals of
events[1]. As with the rest of DOM Core I have attempted to write it from
scratch loosely based on testing browsers and the existing DOM Events
specifications. Glenn Maynard helped out with some details.
I would like to rename Web DOM Core to just DOM Core. The Web prefix
makes it unnecessarily long in my opinion and inconsistent with other
upcoming DOM specifications, such as DOM Range and DOM Parsing and
Serialization. I like the trend of using short and clear names.
Is this okay with
Since Ms2ger now joined the WebApps WG on behalf of the Mozilla Foundation
I have reinstated him as co-editor in the editors' draft. He edited a bulk
of the Nodes section and continues to help out. I hope this is okay with
everyone.
http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/domcore/raw-file/tip/Overview.html
Hi Dom, or W3C Staff,
Can we please get a full rundown of the systems available on test
server. Can we also have all the details about getting access to the
server, etc.
Kind regards,
Marcos
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 10:44 AM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@opera.com wrote:
On Tue, 15 Feb 2011
Anne, PLH, All,
Given we already have RECs for DOM Level {2,3} Core, the proposed name
does seem a little bit odd, but if the naming convention going forward
for other DOM specs will be level-less e.g. DOM {Range, Parsing}, then
the proposal would be consistent with these later specs so it
On 02/12/2011 01:08 AM, Eric Uhrhane wrote:
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 7:43 AM, Olli Pettayolli.pet...@helsinki.fi wrote:
Hi all,
the current File API: Directories and System seems to use
callbacks and not events, yet other
File APIs (the ones for read and write) use events.
That is quite major
||WONTFIX
--- Comment #3 from Anne ann...@opera.com 2011-02-15 15:05:45 UTC ---
Lets go to Last Call without these:
http://krijnhoetmer.nl/irc-logs/whatwg/20110215#l-876
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving
Anne would like to move the Progress Events spec to Last Call Working
Draft (LCWD):
http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/progress/
Note the Process Document states the following regarding the
significance/meaning of a LCWD:
[[
http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/tr.html#last-call
Purpose:
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 3:46 AM, Olli Pettay olli.pet...@helsinki.fi wrote:
On 02/12/2011 01:08 AM, Eric Uhrhane wrote:
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 7:43 AM, Olli Pettayolli.pet...@helsinki.fi
wrote:
Hi all,
the current File API: Directories and System seems to use
callbacks and not events,
Dear Webapps WG,
This is a personal comment on the Widgets PC draft dated 5 October 2010. I
recognize that your last call period closed, however, a colleague of mine
noticed that rule 9 at [1] defines only the ASCII alphabetic ranges and does
not include the ASCII digits. This means that it
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12090
Summary: WEB STORAGE It would be nice to have one Storage
object that you could place wherever you want. You
could simply set a parameter local or define it as
shared and set
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 5:58 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 5:14 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 11:47 AM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org
wrote:
What's the current thinking in terms of events that we're firing? I
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 11:15 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 7:53 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 7:36 PM, David Grogan dgro...@chromium.org
wrote:
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 5:58 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11385
Pablo Castro pablo.cas...@microsoft.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12092
Summary: Please enter your feedback, carefully indicating the
title of the section for which you are submitting
feedback, quoting the text that's wrong today if
appropriate.
Step 7 of the FileReader.readAsDataURL() algorithm currently just says:
Set the result attribute to be blob's data content represented as a Data URL
It should, I think, say something about the using the type of the blob
as well as the content of the blob when forming the data:// URL.
And
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11818
Ian 'Hixie' Hickson i...@hixie.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
22 matches
Mail list logo
