I recently saw what appeared to be the AG group complaining that the
html WG didn't care to specify Accessibility bits even though W3
policy requires considering both internationalization and
accessibility.
I know that we like to innovate and let everyone else backfill the
missing pieces later,
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 1:28 AM, Charles Pritchard ch...@jumis.com wrote:
One issue which comes up is that widget is also used in ARIA to describe ui
elements.
I suspect we'll see apps used ubiquitously; widget seems to e reserved to
early experiments in linked apps; apps via iframe.
Like
The problem with widgets is that the name conflicts (or is a bit different
angle) with the UI widgets (or controls) that are also in use (e.g.
wxWidgets, GTK widgets etc.). We could invent some other name (WAF,
WebApplicationPackaging etc. as people quote already), but ...
On the other hand many
Marcos Caceres wrote:
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 1:28 AM, Charles Pritchardch...@jumis.com wrote:
One issue which comes up is that widget is also used in ARIA to describe ui
elements.
I suspect we'll see apps used ubiquitously; widget seems to e reserved to early
experiments in linked apps;
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13035
Ms2ger ms2...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 11:08 AM, Rich Tibbett ri...@opera.com wrote:
Marcos Caceres wrote:
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 1:28 AM, Charles Pritchardch...@jumis.com
wrote:
One issue which comes up is that widget is also used in ARIA to describe
ui elements.
I suspect we'll see apps used
On Jun/24/2011 4:50 AM, ext Marcin Hanclik wrote:
Changing it now could confuse the industry even more and will not help, I think.
Agreed, and in the abscence of any new and overwhelmingly compelling new
information, I will object to any name change.
-AB
On 24 Jun 2011, at 10:41, Marcos Caceres wrote:
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 11:08 AM, Rich Tibbett ri...@opera.com wrote:
Marcos Caceres wrote:
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 1:28 AM, Charles Pritchardch...@jumis.com
wrote:
One issue which comes up is that widget is also used in ARIA to describe
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 12:44 PM, Scott Wilson
scott.bradley.wil...@gmail.com wrote:
On 24 Jun 2011, at 10:41, Marcos Caceres wrote:
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 11:08 AM, Rich Tibbett ri...@opera.com wrote:
Marcos Caceres wrote:
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 1:28 AM, Charles Pritchardch...@jumis.com
The View Mode Media Feature is commonly used with the device adaption
spec [1]. What would be quite useful would be a way of making meta
viewport respect the widget's width and height (as declared in the
widgets config.xml). My proposal would be to introduce widget-width
and widget-height to be
Hixie, All,
Ian responded [1] to the last set of Server-Sent Events comments I had
noted, and Bugzilla now reports Zarro Boogs [2] for this spec
(11835/Fixed, 11836/WontFix, 12411/Fixed, 12883/WontFix).
As such, this raises the question if the spec is ready for Last Call
Working Draft
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13042
Summary: Define Event.timeStamp
Product: WebAppsWG
Version: unspecified
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13042
Anne ann...@opera.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
And what if the device in question is just a touchscreen with no
keyboard, mouse or hardware buttons?
From the draft spec: Touch devices may also choose to reserve a portion of
the touch interface for an unlock gesture.
Mouse lock seems irrelevant on a touchscreen...
I've added
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 12:00 PM, Vincent Scheib sch...@google.com wrote:
I've added clarification to the draft spec in the use case section,
Touch screen device input
All the application use cases are relevant on touch screen devices as well.
A user should be permitted to make large gestures
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 5:20 AM, Simon Pieters sim...@opera.com wrote:
On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 00:43:52 +0200, Aryeh Gregor simetrical+...@gmail.com
wrote:
There's a middle ground here: you can lock the mouse to the window,
but not completely. That is, if the user moves the mouse to the edge,
it
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13020
Ms2ger ms2...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||i...@hixie.ch,
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 4:52 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
On Tue, 21 Jun 2011, Ian Hickson wrote:
How about we just make postMessage() take the object to clone in the first
argument, an array of objects to transfer in the second; on the other
side, the author receives the object
On Fri, 24 Jun 2011, Kenneth Russell wrote:
Slightly larger issue. In the typed array spec, views like Float32Array
refer to an ArrayBuffer instance. It's desired to be able to transfer
multiple views of the same ArrayBuffer in the same postMessage call.
Currently, because each
19 matches
Mail list logo
