RE: RfC: moving Web Storage to WG Note; deadline June 29

2011-06-27 Thread Adrian Bateman
On Wednesday, June 22, 2011 3:24 PM, James Robinson wrote: On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 2:42 PM, Aryeh Gregor simetrical+...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 10:50 PM, Boris Zbarsky bzbar...@mit.edu wrote: Note that there are currently major browsers that do not follow the spec as

Re: RfC: moving Web Storage to WG Note; deadline June 29

2011-06-27 Thread Charles McCathieNevile
On Mon, 27 Jun 2011 17:43:15 +0200, Adrian Bateman adria...@microsoft.com wrote: On Wednesday, June 22, 2011 3:24 PM, James Robinson wrote: On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 2:42 PM, Aryeh Gregor simetrical+...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 10:50 PM, Boris Zbarsky bzbar...@mit.edu

[Bug 13071] New: Once the end of the file is reached, the user agent must dispatch the event one final time, as defined below means an implementation may parse a partial (corrupt) event as a final

2011-06-27 Thread bugzilla
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13071 Summary: Once the end of the file is reached, the user agent must dispatch the event one final time, as defined below means an implementation may parse a partial (corrupt)

Re: Indicating certificate order in XML Dig Sig

2011-06-27 Thread Marcos Caceres
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 3:21 PM, Cantor, Scott E. canto...@osu.edu wrote: On 6/20/11 8:37 AM, Marcos Caceres marcosscace...@gmail.com wrote: Is there some means to explicitly indicate the order in which certificates in an xml dig sig file should be processed? The problem is that if you screw up

RE: [indexeddb] Count property on IDBCursor

2011-06-27 Thread Israel Hilerio
On Thursday, June 23, 2011 7:42 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote: On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 5:34 PM, Israel Hilerio isra...@microsoft.com wrote: Is there a reason why we don't have a count or number of records property on IDBCursor?  Pablo told me that we used to have one.  What happened to it? It

RE: [indexeddb] IDBTransaction.oncomplete event type equals commit

2011-06-27 Thread Israel Hilerio
On Thursday, June 23, 2011 1:52 PM, Israel Hilerio wrote: We noticed that section 4.3 Steps for committing a transaction talks about setting the event type for the IDBTransction.oncomplete event handler to commit.   Did we intend for the handler to be named oncommit or should the event type

[indexeddb] openCursor optional parameters issue

2011-06-27 Thread Israel Hilerio
The IDBObjectStore.openCursor method is defined to have two optional parameters: * IDBRequest openCursor (in optional any range, in optional unsigned short direction) raises (IDBDatabaseException); Based on the examples in the spec, it seems we're envisioning the method to be used in the

Re: Mouse Lock

2011-06-27 Thread Gregg Tavares (wrk)
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 10:58 AM, Aryeh Gregor simetrical+...@gmail.comwrote: On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 5:20 AM, Simon Pieters sim...@opera.com wrote: On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 00:43:52 +0200, Aryeh Gregor simetrical+...@gmail.com wrote: There's a middle ground here: you can lock the mouse to

Re: Mouse Lock

2011-06-27 Thread Glenn Maynard
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 8:59 PM, Gregg Tavares (wrk) g...@google.comwrote: As far as I know if a game wants to limit movement of the mouse inside a window they just mouselock and display their own mouse pointer. The original is hidden and their pointer logic uses the deltas to move their

Re: [indexeddb] openCursor optional parameters issue

2011-06-27 Thread Jonas Sicking
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 11:42 AM, Israel Hilerio isra...@microsoft.com wrote: The IDBObjectStore.openCursor method is defined to have two optional parameters: * IDBRequest openCursor (in optional any range, in optional unsigned short direction) raises (IDBDatabaseException); Based on the