Hi all,
I think the PATCH method [1] should be supported in the XMLHttpRequest2
(section 4.6.1).
[1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5789
Regards,
Dominik Tomaszuk
On Wed, 17 Aug 2011 11:35:07 +0200, Dominik Tomaszuk ddo...@wp.pl wrote:
I think the PATCH method [1] should be supported in the XMLHttpRequest2
(section 4.6.1).
[1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5789
All methods are already supported.
--
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
On 17.08.2011 11:42, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Wed, 17 Aug 2011 11:35:07 +0200, Dominik Tomaszuk ddo...@wp.pl wrote:
I think the PATCH method [1] should be supported in the
XMLHttpRequest2 (section 4.6.1).
All methods are already supported.
In Section 4.6.1 is:
If method is a
On Wed, 17 Aug 2011 11:48:19 +0200, Dominik Tomaszuk ddo...@wp.pl wrote:
In Section 4.6.1 is:
If method is a case-insensitive match for CONNECT, DELETE, GET, HEAD,
OPTIONS, POST, PUT, TRACE, or TRACK subtract 0x20 from each byte in
the range 0x61 (ASCII a) to 0x7A (ASCII z).
IMO it would
On 08/17/2011 04:54 AM, Rafael Weinstein wrote:
TL;DR;
1) ObserveSubtree semantics doesn't provide a robust mechanism for
observing a tree/fragment, and if we don't provide something more
complete, libraries will likely register observers at every node in
the document.
ModificationBatch
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13678
Anne ann...@opera.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13681
Anne ann...@opera.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
On Wed, 17 Aug 2011 00:52:33 +0200, Adrian Bateman
adria...@microsoft.com wrote:
It's harder to participate without understanding the scope of the
problems being solved.
Bringing that point up just before publication as a means to block said
publication is not helpful. There has been ample
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 3:17 AM, Olli Pettay olli.pet...@helsinki.fi wrote:
On 08/17/2011 04:54 AM, Rafael Weinstein wrote:
TL;DR;
1) ObserveSubtree semantics doesn't provide a robust mechanism for
observing a tree/fragment, and if we don't provide something more
complete, libraries will
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13808
Summary: Let users make whitespace visible
Product: WebAppsWG
Version: unspecified
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P2
Here are some tryserver builds.
http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/try-builds/opet...@mozilla.com-e57a1a317f25/
The default is mostly-sync approach,
but if one sets dom.AlmostAsyncModificationBatch to true
(load about:config, right click, add new boolean),
and restarts the browser,
At http://www.w3.org/TR/IndexedDB/#key-construct within the text, it
says that Arrays are the largest-valued keys: For purposes of
comparison, all Arrays are greater than all DOMString, Date and float
values; all DOMString values are greater than all Date and float
values; and all Date values are
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 9:53 AM, Jim Jewett jimjjew...@gmail.com wrote:
At http://www.w3.org/TR/IndexedDB/#key-construct within the text, it
says that Arrays are the largest-valued keys: For purposes of
comparison, all Arrays are greater than all DOMString, Date and float
values; all
Correct me if I'm wrong. Changing the XHR2 spec to include other
methods in that aforementioned list has the potential to break
applications that use method names that are not all-uppercase. Is this
right?
Andres Riofrio
riofr...@gmail.com
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 2:58 AM, Anne van Kesteren
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13631
Aryeh Gregor a...@aryeh.name changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13811
Summary: Add tests for collapsed whitespace
Product: WebAppsWG
Version: unspecified
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
On Tuesday, August 16, 2011 8:08 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
On Monday, August 15, 2011, Shawn Wilsher m...@shawnwilsher.com wrote:
On 8/15/2011 3:31 PM, Israel Hilerio wrote:
When the db is doing a commit after processing all records on the
transaction, if for some reason it fails, should
On Wed, 17 Aug 2011 20:00:12 +0200, Andres Riofrio riofr...@gmail.com
wrote:
Correct me if I'm wrong. Changing the XHR2 spec to include other
methods in that aforementioned list has the potential to break
applications that use method names that are not all-uppercase. Is this
right?
That is
On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 5:13 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
Hi All,
XHR Level 2 does wonders for making XMLHttpRequest better. However
there is one problem that we have run into with streaming data.
Using .responseType=text you can read the contents of the data as
soon as it
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13812
Summary: The EventSource garbage collection does not mention
open/error events. It also does not seem to match the
language entirely of WebSocket garbage collection.
Product:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13611
Eliot Graff eliot...@microsoft.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 3:08 PM, Israel Hilerio isra...@microsoft.com wrote:
On Tuesday, August 16, 2011 8:08 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
On Monday, August 15, 2011, Shawn Wilsher m...@shawnwilsher.com wrote:
On 8/15/2011 3:31 PM, Israel Hilerio wrote:
When the db is doing a commit after
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 3:22 PM, Chris Rogers crog...@google.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 5:13 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
Hi All,
XHR Level 2 does wonders for making XMLHttpRequest better. However
there is one problem that we have run into with streaming data.
Using
23 matches
Mail list logo
