On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 1:00 PM, Kenneth Rohde Christiansen
kenneth.r.christian...@intel.com wrote:
Hi there,
CSS Device Adaptation should hopefully be enabled on all browsers (desktop
and mobile) unlike the viewport meta tag, which cannot be enabled on
desktop browsers easily as many
Hi there,
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 10:58 AM, Lars Knudsen lar...@gmail.com wrote:
IMO, this would be a much more clean and easy to understand solution than
providing a separate API for orientation lock. It would also remove 1
unknown element when game developers try to juggle mappings between
On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 1:27 AM, Ojan Vafai o...@chromium.org wrote:
The main use case I can think of for mixed editability is an image with a
caption. If anyone has other use-cases, that would be helpful in reasoning
about this. http://jsfiddle.net/UAJKe/
A video with JavaScript controls
On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 6:18 PM, Boris Zbarsky bzbar...@mit.edu wrote:
On 6/9/13 7:35 PM, Timmy Willison wrote:
I was a little confused. I realized something I already knew in that
elem.querySelector[All] does limit the matched set to the descendants of
element
Right. But find() does not, for
Thank you both. That helps a lot. I figured el.querySelector(:scope +
div) would do the same thing as el.find(+ div).
Perhaps more examples in the spec that clearly demonstrate differences like
this between qSA() and findAll() would be helpful. I think some form of the
example that Tab gave would
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 1:15 PM, Timmy Willison timmywill...@gmail.com wrote:
Thank you both. That helps a lot. I figured el.querySelector(:scope + div)
would do the same thing as el.find(+ div).
Perhaps more examples in the spec that clearly demonstrate differences like
this between qSA()
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 4:47 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.comwrote:
Just throw away your notion that .find() does any scoping whatsoever.
Ok, will do.
It doesn't; all it does is provide a reference element, which is
matched by :scope and which is used to absolutize relative
