[W3C TCP and UDP Socket API] Informal CfC on moving the SysApps TCP and UDP Socket APi to a Community Group

2015-04-14 Thread Nilsson, Claes1
The SysApps WG charter expired Oct 1 2014 and no re-chartering process is in progress. Similar to Wayne Carr's CfC on Intel's SysApps specification, https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sysapps/2015Mar/0001.html, I am issuing an informal CfC on moving the SysApps TCP and UDP Socket API

Re: WebIDL Plans

2015-04-14 Thread Yves Lafon
On 10 Apr 2015, at 18:49, Boris Zbarsky bzbar...@mit.edu wrote: On 4/10/15 8:53 AM, Yves Lafon wrote: * Everything from old v1 expect ArrayClass which is not used, nor implemented anywhere. It's implemented in Gecko and used for both DOMRectList and MediaList in Gecko, fwiw. I'm

Re: PSA: Seeking feedback on W3C's Modern Tooling project

2015-04-14 Thread Melvin Carvalho
On 14 April 2015 at 14:29, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@gmail.com wrote: [Bcc public-openw3c ] Hi All, In case you missed it, last February, Robin, Philippe and others (see [1] for a list of contributors) started a project to capture the state of the discussion about modernising the tooling

[Bug 28491] New: [Shadow]: [Meta] Unblock Mozilla's shipping of Shadow DOM

2015-04-14 Thread bugzilla
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=28491 Bug ID: 28491 Summary: [Shadow]: [Meta] Unblock Mozilla's shipping of Shadow DOM Product: WebAppsWG Version: unspecified Hardware: PC OS: All

Re: WebIDL Plans

2015-04-14 Thread Boris Zbarsky
On 4/14/15 8:22 AM, Yves Lafon wrote: I remember ArrayClass removed from NodeList for the reason of lack of implementations, and even plans for implementation It was removed because as things stand it's not web-compatible. Once @@isConcatSpreadable exists in implementations, we could and

Re: Mozilla and the Shadow DOM

2015-04-14 Thread Dimitri Glazkov
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 5:38 AM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@annevk.nl wrote: On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 6:11 PM, Dimitri Glazkov dglaz...@google.com wrote: Thanks for the feedback! While the iron is hot I went ahead and created/updated bugs in the tracker. A problem I have with this approach is

[Bug 27637] [Shadow]: Explain the CSS inheritance in terms of Composed Tree

2015-04-14 Thread bugzilla
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=27637 Hayato Ito hay...@chromium.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug 27359] [Shadow]: Need to define interaction with directionality

2015-04-14 Thread bugzilla
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=27359 Hayato Ito hay...@chromium.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

Re: Mozilla and the Shadow DOM

2015-04-14 Thread Daniel Freedman
Just to close the loop, filed https://github.com/webcomponents/webcomponentsjs/issues/289 to track the specific Polymer web component polyfill blocker. On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 5:38 AM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@annevk.nl wrote: On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 6:11 PM, Dimitri Glazkov dglaz...@google.com

Re: Mozilla and the Shadow DOM

2015-04-14 Thread Daniel Freedman
!-- Whoops, my draft got cut off. -- We found some timing issues with polyfill HTML Imports and native Custom Elements in Chrome that made us force the Custom Elements polyfill when HTML Imports is polyfilled. I don't remember the specifics, but I filed the github issue to either track down and

IndieUI Teleconference Agenda; 15 April at 21:00Z

2015-04-14 Thread Janina Sajka
Cross-posting as is usual ... What: IndieUI Task Force Teleconference When: Wednesday 15 April 2:00 PMSan Francisco -- U.S. Pacific Time (PDT: UTC -7) 4:00 PMAustin -- U.S. Central Time(CDT: UTC -5) 5:00 PMBoston -- U.S.

PSA: Seeking feedback on W3C's Modern Tooling project

2015-04-14 Thread Arthur Barstow
[Bcc public-openw3c ] Hi All, In case you missed it, last February, Robin, Philippe and others (see [1] for a list of contributors) started a project to capture the state of the discussion about modernising the tooling that supports the making of W3C standards. The working document is

Re: Mozilla and the Shadow DOM

2015-04-14 Thread Anne van Kesteren
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 6:11 PM, Dimitri Glazkov dglaz...@google.com wrote: Thanks for the feedback! While the iron is hot I went ahead and created/updated bugs in the tracker. A problem I have with this approach is that with Shadow DOM (and maybe Web Components in general) there's a lot of open