Re: Custom Element Action Items?

As for Custom Elements, I think the following is one of the Action Items: https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/287 Could someone add a missing action item to GitHub Issues if it exists? As for the Shadow DOM spec, I'm updating the spec so that it adapts the Slots and other changes which

[Bug 25097] Update HTTP and HTTPAUTH references to new HTTPbis specs

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=25097 Anne ann...@annevk.nl changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug 25097] Update HTTP and HTTPAUTH references to new HTTPbis specs

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=25097 Julian Reschke julian.resc...@gmx.de changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED

[Bug 29049] Queue a microtask to unset active on transaction

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=29049 Joshua Bell jsb...@google.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug 16137] IndexedDB: Add API for enumerating databases

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=16137 Joshua Bell jsb...@google.com changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|LATER |MOVED --- Comment #4

[Bug 22370] Inform script of corruption-induced data loss

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=22370 Joshua Bell jsb...@google.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED

[Bug 25223] IDB exposes GC behavior

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=25223 Joshua Bell jsb...@google.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED

[Bug 22130] Modification for IDBObjectStore's clear and delete method

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=22130 Joshua Bell jsb...@google.com changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|LATER |MOVED --- Comment #4

[Bug 11528] We should add some form of dynamic transaction to IndexedDB

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11528 Joshua Bell jsb...@google.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jsb...@google.com

[Bug 21836] Remove NotSupportedError on creating index for multiEntry index with array keyPath

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=21836 Joshua Bell jsb...@google.com changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|LATER |MOVED --- Comment #6

[Bug 10000] Allow expressions in addition to keyPaths when creating indexes

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1 Joshua Bell jsb...@google.com changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|LATER |MOVED --- Comment #5

[Bug 28067] DOMStringList has been removed from DOM

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=28067 Joshua Bell jsb...@google.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug 28456] nested keyPath: allow specification which part should be iterated if it's an array

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=28456 Joshua Bell jsb...@google.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

Re: W3C's version of XMLHttpRequest should be abandoned

Hey all, Like Jungkee, I haven't been active editing the XHR spec. I too feel like XHR L1 is very far from trivial. That is because the snapshot Domenic is talking about is not what XHR L1 is supposed to be. XHR L1 is supposed to be a state of what is actually implemented in released browsers at

[Bug 29049] New: Queue a microtask to unset active on transaction

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=29049 Bug ID: 29049 Summary: Queue a microtask to unset active on transaction Product: WebAppsWG Version: unspecified Hardware: PC OS: All Status: NEW

Custom Element Action Items?

Hi All, I was unable to attend the latest F2F so would like clarification on what the takeaway action items were and who is responsible for pushing them forward. I don't believe this information was included in the minutes. I heard there was agreement around Shadow DOM. Who is tasked with

Re: Is polyfilling future web APIs a good idea?

On Aug 6, 2015 11:05 PM, Glen Huang curvedm...@gmail.com wrote: This assumes you'll match That's a good point. I agree for most APIs it's probably better to simply use polyfill code for all browsers. But some APIs have some extra benefits that might not be polyfillable. For example, the

Re: [charter] What is the plan for Streams API?

On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 2:07 PM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@gmail.com wrote: Given Takeshi's status it seems premature to speculate. The current [TR] is now mostly void of content although it might be good to gut it even more as well as to add a clear note that indicates that work has stopped

Re: [charter] What is the plan for Streams API?

On 8/7/15 8:32 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 1:56 PM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@gmail.com wrote: Given this status, and in the absence of other feedback, I think the Streams API should remain in WebApps' charter (at least for now). Then later, the work may proceed (if