On 8/7/15 8:32 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 1:56 PM, Arthur Barstow <art.bars...@gmail.com> wrote:
Given this status, and in the absence of other feedback, I think the Streams
API should remain in WebApps' charter (at least for now). Then later, the
work may proceed (if there is still agreement an additional API would be
useful); otherwise, if there is agreement to stop the work, the work can be
stopped (and a WG Note published).
What would this additional API do?
Given Takeshi's status it seems premature to speculate.
The current [TR] is now mostly void of content although it might be good
to gut it even more as well as to add a clear note that indicates that
work has stopped and might not resume.